permit a court to order family therapy or reunification therapy in a custody or visitation dispute.
This bill allows courts in South Dakota to order family therapy or reunification therapy when deciding custody or visitation disputes involving children. The legislation gives judges the authority to require parents or guardians to participate in therapeutic sessions aimed at improving family relationships and resolving conflicts. Directly affected parties include parents, guardians, and children involved in custody cases where family dynamics are a central issue. The key provision enables courts to mandate these therapy services as part of their decisions, rather than leaving such interventions entirely to voluntary participation. This change provides an additional tool for judges to address family conflict while making custody determinations.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Feb 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Jan 28, 2025
Signed Mar 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
4 edits
·
Feb 26, 2025
MODERATE
This bill transforms from a browser compatibility error page into a complete enrolled legislative act that permits courts to order family therapy or reunification therapy in custody disputes between parents. The text establishes a rebuttable presumption against ordering such therapy when domestic abuse has occurred, protecting victims from being forced into therapeutic settings with their abusers.
Scope change
The bill's scope changed from a non-existent legislative document to an active enrolled statute applicable to all custody and visitation disputes between parents in South Dakota courts.
SCOPE
New section 25.503.12 authorizes courts to order family therapy or reunification therapy to help parents formulate or modify custody plans.
ELIGIBILITY
Cost allocation requirement mandates that courts must split therapy costs between the disputing parents.
REQUIREMENT
Rebuttable presumption against ordering therapy if one party or a child involved has been a victim of domestic abuse by the other party.
TECHNICAL
Formal enrollment documents including signatures from Senate leadership, Governor, and filing dates for the 100th Legislative Session.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 13, 2025 · House Feb 25, 2025
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Feb 13, 2025
D
Democratic3
100% Yea
R
Republican32
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
9
Committee
3
Mar 6, 2025
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor on 2025-03-06 S.J. 459
executive
Feb 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 429
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President S.J. 397
upper
Feb 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 70, NAYS 0 H.J. 385
upper
Feb 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed,
upper
Feb 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0
upper
Feb 19, 2025
Committee
Referred to H.J. 324
upper
Feb 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 35, NAYS 0 S.J. 268
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 259
upper
Feb 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 6, NAYS 0
upper
Jan 28, 2025
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to S.J. 112
upper
10 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 111
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 111. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline