define the term "must."
HB 1067 is a procedural bill that seeks to define the term "must" within South Dakota state laws and regulations. The legislation would establish a specific legal interpretation for this word to ensure consistency across various statutes. This clarification primarily affects state agencies, courts, and legal professionals who apply these laws. The bill aims to reduce ambiguity in legal documents by providing a standardized definition for this common term.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Jan 17, 2025
Signed Mar 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
1 edit
·
Mar 3, 2025
MINOR
This bill formally defines the legal term 'must' in South Dakota state law to ensure it is interpreted as a mandatory directive without discretion. The change clarifies that 'must' and 'shall' carry the same mandatory weight in legal documents, preventing ambiguity in how laws are enforced. This provides consistency and clarity for courts, agencies, and citizens interpreting state statutes.
Scope change
The bill applies statewide to all South Dakota Codified Laws and does not alter the scope of applicability beyond clarifying existing legal terminology.
DEFINITION
Added a formal definition for the term 'must' in § 2-14-2.1 to establish it as a mandatory directive without discretion, aligning it with the existing definition of 'shall'.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 27, 2025 · House Jan 27, 2025
How they voted
22–11
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Feb 27, 2025
D
Democratic3
66% Yea
R
Republican32
62% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
7
Committee
3
Mar 13, 2025
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor on 2025-03-13 H.J. 542
executive
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Signed by the President S.J. 443
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 443
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 22, NAYS 11 S.J. 409
lower
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 1
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to S.J. 153
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 2 H.J. 124
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 13, NAYS 0
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Introduced
First read in House and referred to H.J. 37
lower
11 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1067
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1067. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline