HR 1526 United States House · 119th Congress

NORRA of 2025

HR 1526 (NORRA of 2025) limits U.S. district courts' power to issue injunctions. It prohibits courts from granting court orders that stop actions affecting parties outside the specific lawsuit, restricting injunctions to apply only to the immediate parties involved in the case. This change would directly affect federal district courts and the parties seeking injunctive relief in litigation. The bill adds Section 1370 to Title 28 of the U.S. Code, requiring that any injunction be limited to the specific case parties. It does not alter other court powers or affect existing legal procedures beyond this specific restriction.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
President
Introduced Feb 24, 2025 Last action Apr 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced in House Engrossed in House · 6 edits · Apr 9, 2025
MODERATE
The Engrossed version restructures the core provision into subsections and adds two major new mechanisms: (1) it clarifies that the injunction ban covers non-parties represented by class-action-style representatives, and (2) it creates a three-judge panel exception for multi-state challenges to executive branch actions, with random judge selection and a direct appeal option to the Supreme Court. These changes significantly alter how the bill would operate in practice.
SCOPE

The general ban on injunctions now explicitly covers non-parties represented by a party acting in a representative capacity under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (e.g., class action representatives), broadening who is protected from being bound by an injunction.

REQUIREMENT

A new subsection (b) requires that when two or more states in different circuits challenge an executive branch action, the case must be referred to a three-judge panel selected under section 2284, but with random selection of judges rather than appointment by the circuit chief judge.

The three-judge panel must consider three factors when deciding whether to issue an injunction: the interest of justice, the risk of irreparable harm to non-parties, and the preservation of constitutional separation of powers.

ELIGIBILITY

The three-judge panel created under subsection (b) is authorized to issue injunctions that would otherwise be prohibited by the general ban in subsection (a), making it an exception to the core restriction.

ENFORCEMENT

A new subsection (c) allows appeals from three-judge panel orders to go either to the circuit court or directly to the Supreme Court at the preference of the appealing party, providing a faster path to final review.

TECHNICAL

The short title was updated to include 'of 2025' for temporal specificity.

Floor votes · House Apr 9, 2025

How they voted

219213
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 433
Apr 9, 2025
D Democratic213
212 Nay 1
99% Nay
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican219
218 Yea 1 Nay
99% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Apr 10, 2025
Committee
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 98).
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
Ms. Ross moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H1550-1551)
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 294 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 18, S.J. Res. 28, H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-40.
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
1 primary · 14 co-sponsors

Sponsors