HB 1613 Pennsylvania House · 2025-2026 Regular Session

An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in juvenile matters, further providing for definitions and for release or delivery to court, providing for mandatory counsel, for child interrogation and for refusal to be recorded electronically and further providing for powers and duties of the Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.

HB 1613 proposes changes to Pennsylvania's juvenile court procedures. It requires courts to provide mandatory legal counsel for young people in court cases, sets new rules for how children can be questioned by authorities, and allows juveniles to refuse having their interviews recorded electronically. The bill directly affects youth involved in juvenile court, their attorneys, and court staff handling these cases. These provisions aim to strengthen procedural safeguards during juvenile court proceedings. The bill is currently in committee review after being re-committed to the Appropriations committee.
Bill status in committee 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jun 2025
Committee Review
Oct 2025
House Passage
Oct 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jun 16, 2025 Last action Oct 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Printer's No. PN1930 Printer's No. PN2440 · 5 edits
MODERATE
This bill adds new protections for children during police interrogations, including mandatory electronic recording requirements, expanded rights to have a parent or attorney present, and new rules about refusing to be recorded. It also clarifies when statements made by children can be used in court and adds a new section addressing situations where recording is refused.
Scope change
The bill expands protections to include explicit requirements for electronic recording of child interrogations and adds new procedures for handling refusals to be recorded.
REQUIREMENT

Added a requirement that child interrogations must be recorded electronically unless it is impossible or unsafe to do so.

Added new provisions stating that statements made by children during custodial interrogations are inadmissible if the officer failed to follow recording requirements or if the child's parent/guardian/attorney was not present.

Added a new section addressing situations where a child or their representative refuses to participate in electronic recording, including rules about how to handle such refusals during interrogations.

Added that mandatory counsel requirements cannot be waived and apply regardless of whether the child is in custody.

DEFINITION

Modified the definition of 'custodial interrogation' to clarify it applies when questioning is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.

Floor votes · House Oct 8, 2025

How they voted

102101
Passed
Total votes 203
Oct 8, 2025
D Democratic102
102 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican101
101 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Oct 8, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (102-101)
house
Oct 8, 2025
Committee
Re-committed to Appropriations
lower
Sep 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported as committed
lower
Jun 16, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary
lower
1 primary · 16 co-sponsors

Sponsors