Relating to violations of the Insurance Code as unlawful trade practices.
Summary
Provides that a violation of prohibitions against certain practices with respect to insurance is subject to an enforcement action under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act. Specifies exemptions. Removes some exemptions for insurance from the definition of "real estate, goods or services" under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act. Permits a person to obtain, and a court to award, appropriate equitable relief in addition to monetary damages under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act. Requires the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services to request action before a prosecuting attorney may take action under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act against an act or practice related to insurance.
Bill status
failed
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
House Failed
Feb 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026
Last action Mar 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
A-Engrossed
·
5 edits
MODERATE
This bill expands consumer protections by adding insurance-related bad acts to the Unlawful Trade Practices Act, allowing victims to seek equitable relief like injunctions in addition to monetary damages. It also clarifies that insurance companies are not exempt from the Act's definitions regarding real estate, goods, or services, and updates the list of bill sponsors to reflect new co-sponsors.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to explicitly include insurance practices under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act, whereas previously insurance was partially exempt from certain definitions.
ENFORCEMENT
Added the ability for courts to award equitable relief (such as injunctions) alongside monetary damages for violations of insurance-related prohibitions.
DEFINITION
Removed exemptions for insurance companies from the definition of 'real estate, goods, or services' under the Unlawful Trade Practices Act.
Revised the definition of 'Examination' to remove bracketed alternative phrasing, clarifying the scope of documentary material review.
Revised the definition of 'Person' to remove bracketed alternative phrasing, standardizing the list of eligible entities.
ELIGIBILITY
Updated the list of bill sponsors to include Representatives SOSA, EVANS, GOMBERG, and JAVADI, while removing Representatives GAMBA and WISE from the original list.
Floor votes · House Feb 18, 2026
How they voted
28–29
Failed · 2 other
Total votes 59
Feb 18, 2026
D
Democratic37
75% Yea
R
Republican22
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Feb 18, 2026
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (28-29-2)
house
Feb 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
Minority Recommendation: Do pass with different amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection.
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
lower
3 primary · 19 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
April Dobson
DDemocratic
P
Floyd Prozanski
DDemocratic
P
Nathan Sosa
DDemocratic
Co
Cyrus Javadi
DDemocratic
Co
Dacia Grayber
DDemocratic
Co
Deb Patterson
DDemocratic
Co
Farrah Chaichi
DDemocratic
Co
Jeff Golden
DDemocratic
Co
Jules Walters
DDemocratic
Co
Kayse Jama
DDemocratic
Co
Khanh Pham
DDemocratic
Co
Lamar Wise
DDemocratic
Co
Lew Frederick
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 4098
Scope: OR
Hi! I can help you understand HB 4098. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline