HB 2461 Oregon House · 2025 Regular Session

Relating to remote location testimony.

HB 2461 revises the rules for allowing remote location testimony in civil court proceedings, including cases related to child welfare, family abuse, and elder abuse prevention. It changes the required notice for requesting remote testimony from a fixed 30 days to a flexible "sufficiently in advance" standard. The bill also broadens the court's consideration of available technology and facilities to ensure reliable remote testimony for all involved parties. Courts will weigh factors like a witness's hardship or safety against potential prejudice to the non-moving party when deciding on remote testimony requests. The party requesting remote testimony is responsible for all associated costs.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Jan 13, 2025 Signed May 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced Enrolled · 6 edits · May 7, 2025
MODERATE
This bill updates Oregon's rules for remote testimony in court, making it easier to allow witnesses to testify via technology while adding safeguards. It clarifies when remote testimony is appropriate, what factors courts must consider, and how costs are handled.
Scope change
The bill expands applicability to include specific proceedings under ORS 107.700 to 107.735 (likely child welfare or family court matters) with special considerations for safety and expedited timelines.
REQUIREMENT

Changed notice requirements from a fixed 30-day rule to a flexible standard based on whether notice is given sufficiently in advance to allow proper challenge of factors.

Added new factor requiring courts to consider whether reliable facilities and technology are available to all parties and the witness.

Added new factor requiring courts to consider whether personal appearance is needed due to safety or welfare threats to the party or witness.

Added requirement for courts to consider the expedited nature of certain proceedings when determining if notice is sufficient.

Added exception stating that motions are not required for ex parte hearings held by telephone under specific statutes.

Removed bracketed text about 30-day notice minimum that was previously in the law, replacing it with the more flexible 'sufficiently in advance' language.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2025 · House Mar 18, 2025

How they voted

280
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 29
Apr 30, 2025
D Democratic17
16 Yea 1
94% Yea
R Republican12
12 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
4
May 7, 2025
Signed into law
Governor signed.
lower
May 1, 2025
Upper · Passed
President signed.
upper
May 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Speaker signed.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Upper · Passed
Third reading. Carried by Broadman. Passed.
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
Recommendation: Do pass.
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary.
upper
Mar 20, 2025
Introduced
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
upper
Mar 18, 2025
Lower · Passed
Third reading. Carried by Andersen. Passed.
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Recommendation: Do pass.
lower
Jan 17, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary.
lower
Jan 13, 2025
Introduced
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.