Courts; modifying residency qualification for certain judicial candidacy. Effective date.
SB 956 modifies Oklahoma's residency rules for judicial candidates. It allows candidates from within a judicial district (not just the county) to run for associate district judge vacancies if no local candidates file, and removes residency requirements for appointees filling vacancies who later seek election to a full term. The bill updates Section 92i of Oklahoma Statutes, affecting candidates for district and associate district judge positions. It becomes effective November 1, 2025.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2025
Last action Apr 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Proposed Policy Committee Substitute 1
→
Floor (Senate)
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to remove the 'Proposed Policy Committee Substitute' designation and replace it with the official Senate Floor Version. The substantive policy language regarding judicial candidate eligibility remains unchanged, maintaining requirements for residency and voter registration while allowing appointed judges to run for full terms without meeting those requirements.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains unchanged; only the document version and formatting were modified to reflect Senate floor approval.
TECHNICAL
Removed 'Proposed Policy Committee Substitute' title and replaced with 'Senate Floor Version' dated February 11, 2025, indicating the bill passed the House committee and is now in its final Senate form.
Deleted the House committee amendment header and associated metadata that was used to track the bill during the committee review process.
ELIGIBILITY
Core eligibility requirements for judicial candidates (6-month residency and voter registration) remain intact, as do provisions allowing appointed judges to run for full terms without meeting those requirements.
TIMELINE
The effective date of November 1, 2025 remains unchanged.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 26, 2025
How they voted
40–6
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 49
Mar 26, 2025
D
Democratic9
100% Yea
R
Republican40
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass Civil Judiciary
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
Referred to Civil Judiciary
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Introduced
First Reading
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Upper · Passed
Engrossed to House
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Committee
Referred for engrossment
upper
Mar 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
Measure passed: Ayes: 38 Nays: 6
upper
Feb 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported Do Pass Judiciary committee; CR filed
upper
Feb 3, 2025
Introduced
First Reading
upper
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 956
Scope: OK
Hi! I can help you understand SB 956. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline