Criminal procedure; creating the Public Protection Act; conditions of release; public safety reports. Effective date.

Deleted the provision requiring courts to impose supervision fees when ordering electronic monitoring devices.

Added a floor amendment instruction to delete the entire electronic monitoring subsection and reletter subsequent sections.

Replaced the 'Committee Substitute' header with a 'Floor Amendment' header and updated page numbering and metadata.

Added a specific definition for 'pretrial risk assessment' as a validated actuarial assessment predicting danger or flight risk.

Created a legal presumption that courts must set bail or release conditions consistent with the risk assessment results.

Added a rebuttable presumption mechanism allowing the state to override assessment results only by showing clear and convincing evidence of necessity.

Changed the effective date of the new provisions from January 1, 2027, to November 1, 2026.

Updated internal statutory references and formatting to align with current legislative standards.

The term 'public safety report' was changed to 'pretrial risk assessment' to better describe the validated actuarial tools used for predicting court appearance and new crimes.

Specific details about what information must be included in the report (such as pending charges and protective orders) were removed from the definition section, likely because these are standard components of a risk assessment rather than unique statutory requirements.

The requirement for courts to share assessment results with defense counsel was made mandatory ('shall be provided') instead of discretionary ('shall be provided upon request' was clarified to apply to defense counsel specifically, removing the state's explicit mention in the Senate version).

The act's title was changed from 'Public Protection Act' to 'Pretrial Release Act' to reflect its primary focus on release conditions rather than general public safety.

The term 'pretrial risk assessment' was replaced with 'public safety report' to better describe the tool's specific function.

The report must now explicitly include whether the defendant has outstanding warrants or is subject to current protective orders.

The effective date of the law was changed from November 1, 2026, to January 1, 2027.

Minor formatting changes were made to the bill header and signature lines to reflect its final 'Enrolled' status.

The definition of the risk assessment tool was changed from a general 'public safety report' to a specific 'validated actuarial assessment' that predicts risk of danger or flight.

A new requirement was added mandating that the results of the risk assessment be provided to defense counsel upon request.

References to a separate 'Public Protection Act' and the creation of a 'public safety report' were removed, consolidating the bill's focus on pretrial release procedures.

The language regarding how courts use the assessment was updated to ensure it is not used as the sole basis for granting or denying release, emphasizing it is one factor among many.

Added a new definition for 'public safety report' as a risk assessment tool predicting the likelihood of failure to appear or new crimes.

Changed the requirement from mandatory use of risk assessments for all cases to mandatory use for violent crimes, while allowing optional use for other cases.

Added specific requirements for the content of public safety reports, including detailed criminal history, pending charges, and protective orders.

Modified the rules for when courts must deviate from risk assessment recommendations, adding specific criteria for rebutting the presumption of accuracy.

Added provisions for noncodification, meaning the new law will not be added to the permanent Oklahoma Statutes.