SB 1553 Oklahoma Senate · 2026 Regular Session

Medicaid; specifying certain qualifications for appeals; providing for recovery of certain costs. Effective date.

SB 1553 amends Oklahoma's Medicaid appeal process to ensure appeals for denied claims are reviewed by qualified mental health professionals. It requires reviewers (like psychologists) to hold valid licenses, have relevant clinical experience, and avoid conflicts of interest, while banning automated review systems. The bill also establishes that if an appeal successfully reverses a denied claim, the psychologist or mental health provider can recover costs for time spent on the appeal. This directly affects Medicaid members, providers, and mental health professionals handling appeals.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 2, 2026 Signed May 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons

What changed between versions

Floor (House) Floor (Senate) · 5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to clarify that appeals for Medicaid adverse determinations must be reviewed by a licensed physician, psychologist, or mental health professional, explicitly prohibiting the use of automated software for these reviews. The Senate version also added a requirement for the reviewing professional to possess specific training and experience relevant to the medical condition in question and to consider all pertinent medical records. Additionally, the bill now allows psychologists and mental health professionals to recover reasonable costs and expenses from the contracted entity if their appeal is successful.
Scope change
The scope of the bill was expanded to include psychologists and mental health professionals as qualified reviewers for appeals, whereas the House version focused primarily on physicians. The applicability of the review process is now strictly limited to human professionals, excluding automated systems.
REQUIREMENT

Added a strict prohibition on using automated claim review software or any automated functionality to conduct appeals.

Added specific qualifications for the reviewing professional, requiring them to have training and experience sufficient to determine if the service is medically necessary or clinically appropriate.

Modified the list of qualified reviewers to explicitly include licensed psychologists and mental health professionals alongside physicians.

FISCAL

Added a provision allowing successful appellants (psychologists or mental health professionals) to recover time and expenses from the contracted entity if the adverse determination is reversed.

DEFINITION

Clarified the criteria for a psychologist's qualifications, requiring current licensure under the Psychologists Licensing Act and specific training in testing and treatment of the condition.

Floor votes · Senate Mar 25, 2026 · House May 6, 2026

How they voted

480
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 50
Mar 25, 2026
D Democratic9
9 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican41
39 Yea 2
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
May 13, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor 05/12/2026
upper
May 6, 2026
Committee
Referred for enrollment
upper
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 90 Nays: 2
lower
Apr 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
CR; Do Pass Health and Human Services Oversight Committee
lower
Apr 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
Policy recommendation to the Health and Human Services Oversight committee; Do Pass Public Health
lower
Mar 30, 2026
Committee
Referred to Public Health
lower
Mar 26, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
lower
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Engrossed to House
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Committee
Referred for engrossment
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Measure passed: Ayes: 45 Nays: 0
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Introduced
General Order, Amended
upper
Feb 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Appropriations
upper
Feb 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Do Pass as amended Health and Human Services committee; CR filed
upper
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
upper
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors