HB 3298 Oklahoma House · 2026 Regular Session

Civil procedure; Uniform Judicial Interview of Children Act; terms; scope; judicial officer; judicial interview; considerations; training; procedure; record; codification; effective date.

HB 3298 establishes standardized procedures for Oklahoma judges to interview children in custody, visitation, and adoption cases. It requires judges conducting such interviews to have specialized training and consider factors like the child's age, potential harm, and whether alternatives exist. The bill mandates written records of interviews and limits attendance to the child's attorney and guardian ad litem, excluding parents. It applies to most civil child-related court cases but excludes existing juvenile court proceedings and testimony.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
May 2026
House Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
May 2026
Introduced Feb 2, 2026 Signed May 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

Floor (House) Floor (Senate) · 4 edits
MODERATE
The bill text was updated from the House version to the Senate version, incorporating specific formatting changes, updated legislative session dates, and refined legal definitions. The most significant substantive change involves the definition of a 'covered proceeding,' which was expanded to include 'any other matter involving custodial responsibility' beyond the specific list previously provided. Additionally, the requirement for judicial officers was adjusted from needing 'training' to requiring 'certain training,' and the act's title was slightly modified to 'creating' rather than 'enacting.'
Scope change
The scope of the act was expanded to cover a broader range of custodial matters, including those not explicitly listed in the original House version.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'covered proceeding' was expanded to include 'any other matter involving custodial responsibility,' broadening the situations where a judicial interview can occur.

REQUIREMENT

The requirement for judicial officers was changed from having 'training' to having 'certain training,' altering the specificity of the mandate.

TECHNICAL

The act's title was updated from 'enacting' to 'creating,' and the legislative session date was updated to April 14, 2026.

Formatting and punctuation were updated, including changing quotation marks from straight to curly quotes and adjusting indentation.

Floor votes · Senate Apr 29, 2026 · House Mar 24, 2026

How they voted

470
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 50
Apr 29, 2026
D Democratic9
8 Yea 1
88% Yea
R Republican41
39 Yea 2
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
7
May 12, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor 05/12/2026
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
Referred for enrollment
lower
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
Fourth Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 85 Nays: 4
lower
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
SA's read, adopted
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Engrossed to House
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
Referred for engrossment
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Measure passed: Ayes: 46 Nays: 0
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary committee; CR filed
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Engrossed, signed, to Senate
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Committee
Referred for engrossment
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 95 Nays: 0
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
CR; Do Pass Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass Civil Judiciary
lower
Feb 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Civil Judiciary
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
First Reading
lower
2 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors