Crimes and punishments; creating the Oklahoma Crimes and Punishments Act of 2025; effective date.
HB 2067 creates a new process for convicted individuals in Oklahoma to seek relief based on newly available or undermining forensic scientific evidence. It allows people currently incarcerated, on parole/probation, or who have completed sentences to file petitions if such evidence was not available at trial or contradicts evidence used during their conviction. Courts must grant relief if the evidence is "favorable" (meaning it likely would have changed the trial outcome) and the applicant met reasonable diligence standards. This bill directly affects those seeking to overturn convictions through forensic evidence, without changing sentencing laws or creating new criminal offenses.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2025
Last action Feb 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Proposed Policy Committee Substitute 1
·
6 edits
MODERATE
The bill was completely rewritten by the Policy Committee to shift from a broad 'Crimes and Punishments Act' to a more specific 'criminal procedure' bill focused on allowing convicted individuals to seek relief based on new forensic scientific evidence that was unavailable at trial. This change narrows the scope to address wrongful convictions through scientific evidence rather than creating a general crimes framework.
Scope change
Changed from a broad crimes and punishments act to a specific criminal procedure bill focused on forensic scientific evidence petitions.
SCOPE
Bill title and subject matter changed from 'Crimes and Punishments Act' to 'criminal procedure' focusing on forensic scientific evidence.
DEFINITION
Added detailed definitions for 'favorable', 'forensic science', 'forensic scientific evidence', and 'scientific knowledge'.
ELIGIBILITY
Established specific eligibility criteria including incarcerated persons, those on parole/probation, and those who completed sentences.
TIMELINE
Set specific timelines for state response (60 days) and court hearings (30-90 days after filing).
REQUIREMENT
Added requirements for courts to consider whether scientific evidence has changed since the original trial date.
ENFORCEMENT
Created procedures for filing petitions, serving motions to state attorneys, and court authority to grant relief including vacating convictions.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
0
Committee
0
Feb 3, 2025
Introduced
First Reading
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Lepak
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2067
Scope: OK
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2067. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline