Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners Amendments.
This bill modifies North Carolina's Cosmetic Art Act to create a new professional category called "hair designer" specifically for natural hair care services. It reduces the training hours required to become a licensed cosmetologist and removes the apprenticeship requirement for licensure. The legislation also formally defines "natural hair care" as services that involve tension on hair strands through twisting, wrapping, extending, or locking. These changes aim to deregulate certain hair care practices while establishing new licensing pathways for specialists in that field.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Apr 21, 2026
Last action Jun 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
Edition 5
→
Edition 6
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the definitions within the North Carolina Cosmetic Art Act to reflect new licensing categories and remove outdated requirements. Specifically, it adds a definition for 'manicurist teacher' and clarifies the scope of 'hair braiding' by removing restrictions on adhesives and heat, while also deleting the definition for 'apprentice' and references to apprentice licensure.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of regulated activities by formally defining 'manicurist teacher' and broadening the definition of 'hair braiding' to include the use of adhesives and heat, whereas the previous version excluded these methods.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition for 'manicurist teacher' to recognize individuals licensed to teach manicuring.
Modified the definition of 'hair braiding' to remove the exclusion of adhesives and heat, allowing these methods to be used on natural hair without permanently altering it.
Removed the definition of 'apprentice' and the requirement for apprentice licensure, indicating a shift away from that specific training pathway.
Deleted the definition for 'hair designer' and related terms, likely as part of a restructuring of the licensing framework.
Floor votes · Senate May 5, 2026
How they voted
30–15
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 50
May 5, 2026
D
Democratic19
78% Nay
R
Republican31
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
1
Jun 30, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Sub 2
lower
Jun 9, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Finance
lower
Jun 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
lower
May 12, 2026
Committee
Re-ref to the Com on Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
May 7, 2026
Committee
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
May 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed 3rd Reading
upper
May 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amend Adopted A1
upper
May 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reptd Fav
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Com Substitute Adopted
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Finance
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Com Substitute Adopted
upper
Apr 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
upper
Apr 23, 2026
Committee
Re-ref to Regulatory Reform. If fav, re-ref to Finance. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Committee
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
upper
Apr 21, 2026
Introduced
Filed
upper
2 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 808
Scope: NC
Hi! I can help you understand SB 808. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline