Abuse and Deception by Telemarketers.
House Bill 520 aims to protect North Carolina citizens and businesses from deceptive telemarketing practices, particularly those involving misleading caller ID. The bill establishes that a telephone number is the property of the subscriber and prohibits telephone solicitors from misrepresenting the origin of a call or transmitting misleading caller identification information. It also prevents telephone carriers from knowingly providing subscriber numbers to entities that will violate these provisions. Individuals who receive calls in violation of the misleading caller ID rules can sue for civil damages, including an additional $10,000 fine for each knowing violation. Knowing violations of the caller ID provision are also classified as a Class H felony.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 25, 2025
Last action May 7, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Edition 1
→
Edition 2
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was reorganized to add a new definition for 'telephone solicitor' and expanded the list of prohibited actions to include specific alterations that create a false perception of a call's origin. It also strengthened penalties by adding a specific civil fine for each call placed in knowing violation and updated the requirements for telephone carriers regarding subscriber data.
Scope change
The scope of prohibited conduct was broadened to explicitly cover any alteration of call origin that gives a false perception, and the definition of who is subject to the law was clarified to include agents and parties defined under federal rules.
DEFINITION
Added a new definition for 'telephone solicitor' to explicitly include agents and parties defined under the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
REQUIREMENT
Expanded restrictions on telemarketers to prohibit any alteration of call origin that creates a false perception of where the call came from, beyond just misleading information.
Updated requirements for telephone carriers to include a list of entities previously found to violate the law or previously provided information to violators.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a specific provision allowing subscribers to recover $10,000 for each call placed in knowing violation of the spoofing restrictions.
Floor votes · House May 7, 2025
How they voted
113–0
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 121
May 7, 2025
D
Democratic46
89% Yea
I
Independent2
100% Yea
R
Republican73
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 7, 2025
Committee
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
upper
May 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed 3rd Reading
lower
May 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav
lower
May 6, 2025
Committee
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
May 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Committee
Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Introduced
Filed
lower
3 primary · 34 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Allison Dahle
DDemocratic
P
John Bell
RRepublican
P
Mark Brody
RRepublican
Co
Aisha Dew
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Ward
RRepublican
Co
Carla Cunningham
IIndependent
Co
Carolyn Logan
DDemocratic
Co
Charles Smith
DDemocratic
Co
David Willis
RRepublican
Co
Donna White
RRepublican
Co
Donnie Loftis
RRepublican
Co
Eric Ager
DDemocratic
Co
Gloristine Brown
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 520
Scope: NC
Hi! I can help you understand HB 520. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline