Prohibit Misbranding of Certain Food Products.
HB 134 requires manufacturers of cell-cultured, insect-based, or plant-based food products to clearly label items that use meat-related terms (like "beef" or "chicken") with specific qualifying terms (such as "cell-cultured," "plant-based," or "insect-based") in prominent, close proximity on packaging. This directly affects food companies producing alternative meat products that might otherwise confuse consumers by mimicking traditional meat names. The bill defines key terms like "identifying meat term" and "qualifying term" to ensure labels are clear and prevent misleading representations. It mandates that products using terms like "beef" or "chicken" must include these qualifiers to avoid being deemed "misbranded" under North Carolina law. The law aims to ensure transparency for consumers about the origin of these food products.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2025
Last action Mar 26, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Edition 1
→
Edition 2
·
4 edits
MODERATE
The bill was revised to remove specific definitions related to insect-protein and plant-protein products while adding new definitions for 'qualifying term' and 'ratite.' These changes narrow the scope of the legislation to focus more specifically on cell-cultured meat products and traditional meat labeling, while clarifying terminology for consumer disclosure requirements.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by removing explicit references to insect-protein and plant-protein food products, while adding specific definitions for cell-cultured meat disclosure terms and ratite birds.
DEFINITION
Removed definitions for 'insect-protein food product' and 'manufactured-protein food product' which previously included cell-cultured, insect-based, and plant-based alternatives.
Added new definition for 'qualifying term' specifying words like 'cell-cultured,' 'fake,' 'lab-grown,' or 'grown in a lab' that must clearly disclose when meat products are cell-cultured.
Added new definition for 'ratite' to include ostrich, emu, and rhea, extending the bill's provisions to these bird species.
REQUIREMENT
Modified the misbranding requirements by removing specific references to insect and plant protein products while maintaining requirements for cell-cultured food product labeling under G.S. 106-549.28A.
Floor votes · House Mar 25, 2025
How they voted
107–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 121
Mar 25, 2025
D
Democratic46
71% Yea
I
Independent2
100% Yea
R
Republican73
98% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Mar 26, 2025
Committee
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
upper
Mar 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed 3rd Reading
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Committee
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav
lower
Mar 11, 2025
Committee
Re-ref Com On Agriculture and Environment
lower
Mar 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Committee
Re-ref Com On Commerce and Economic Development
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav
lower
Feb 18, 2025
Committee
Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Commerce and Economic Development, if favorable, Agriculture and Environment, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Introduced
Filed
lower
0 primary · 17 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 134
Scope: NC
Hi! I can help you understand HB 134. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline