Deannexations/Limit Certain Powers.
This bill removes three specific parcels of land from the Village of Walnut Creek's jurisdiction, meaning these properties will no longer be subject to municipal taxes starting in 2026. It also limits the village's authority to exercise city-level powers only within its current, contiguous boundaries, though existing development rules in the excluded areas will remain in place temporarily. Additionally, the law validates any property transactions the village completed before this change takes effect, ensuring those past actions are considered legal.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Apr 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Apr 27, 2026
Last action Jun 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Edition 1
→
Edition 2
·
6 edits
MODERATE
The bill was expanded from a single amendment for the Village of Walnut Creek to a comprehensive package covering four municipalities: Vass, Red Oak, Kernersville, and Walnut Creek. The new version removes specific property parcels from each town's corporate limits and limits the powers of the Village of Walnut Creek regarding areas outside its contiguous boundaries. This change broadens the legislative scope to address deannexation needs in multiple counties while maintaining the same effective date and tax implications for all affected areas.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from a single municipality (Walnut Creek) to include three additional municipalities (Vass, Red Oak, and Kernersville), covering multiple counties (Wayne, Moore, Nash, and Forsyth).
SCOPE
Added deannexation provisions for the Town of Vass in Moore County, removing four specific property parcels.
Added deannexation provisions for the Town of Red Oak in Nash County, removing two specific property parcels.
Added deannexation provisions for the Town of Kernersville in Forsyth County, removing one specific property parcel.
Modified the bill title and operative text to include multiple municipalities instead of focusing solely on Walnut Creek.
REQUIREMENT
Added a specific repeal of Chapter 55 of the 1977 Session Laws to legally support the limitation of Walnut Creek's powers.
TITLE
Changed the short title from 'Walnut Creek Deannex' to 'Deannexations/Limit Certain Powers' to reflect the broader scope.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Jun 9, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Jun 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav
lower
May 12, 2026
Committee
Re-ref Com On Finance
lower
May 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reptd Fav Com Substitute
lower
Apr 28, 2026
Committee
Ref to the Com on State and Local Government, if favorable, Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
lower
Apr 27, 2026
Introduced
Filed
lower
0 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1058
Scope: NC
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1058. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline