Establishes rebuttable presumption that person charged with theft of motor vehicle be detained prior to trial under certain circumstances.
S 3267 creates a rebuttable presumption requiring pretrial detention for defendants charged with theft of a motor vehicle (N.J.S.2C:20-2) if they caused death, serious bodily injury, or created a substantial risk of such harm during the theft. This applies specifically to cases where the prosecution establishes probable cause for the underlying offense. The bill shifts the burden to the defendant to prove why detention is unnecessary, rather than requiring the prosecution to demonstrate that no bail or conditions would ensure court appearance or community safety. It amends existing pretrial detention rules to add this specific scenario to the list of offenses triggering the presumption.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 2, 2026
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
1
Key actions
0
Committee
0
Feb 2, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about S 3267
Scope: NJ
Hi! I can help you understand S 3267. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline