A 5116 New Jersey General Assembly · 2024-2025 Regular Session

Revises design of primary election ballots and certain primary election procedures; provides for ballots to be arranged by office block; removes State committee members from primary process; requires reporting on primary elections by Division of Elections.*

New Jersey's A 5116 revises primary election ballot design to address legal concerns about the previous "bracketing" system. The bill requires all primary ballots to arrange candidates by office in standardized "office blocks" (e.g., all Assembly candidates grouped together), with consistent formatting, left-aligned text, and clear candidate labeling - replacing the prior structure that caused voter confusion and legal challenges. It directly affects voters, election officials, and candidates in New Jersey primary elections by standardizing ballot appearance to improve clarity and reduce misinterpretation. The law also removes State committee members from the primary ballot design process, as mandated by the bill’s legislative findings. This change, enacted as P.L.2025, c.32, aims to align with First Amendment principles while ensuring ballots are user-friendly.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Feb 2025
General Assembly Passage
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Dec 9, 2024 Signed Mar 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

Introduced Version Reprint ABD 12/16/24 1R · 10 edits
MAJOR
The First Reprint of A5116 makes several substantive amendments to New Jersey's primary election ballot design law. The most significant changes include: removing the prohibition on using political party names in candidate slogans (replacing it with an anti-deception standard), allowing ovals to appear on either side of candidate names, adding uniformity requirements across all office blocks, permitting candidates to associate across different offices via common slogans, and adding revocation/modification rights for endorsements and associations. The ballot header is also updated to include county-level information.
Scope change
The bill's scope expands in several ways: slogans can now reference political party names (with an anti-deception safeguard), candidates can associate via common slogans across different offices, and the ballot header now includes county-level information. The scope also narrows slightly in that the same-slogan conflict rule in R.S.19:23-18(b) is limited to candidates seeking the same office.
REQUIREMENT

The prohibition on using a political party name in a candidate slogan or endorsement (unless the county political committee consents) is removed. It is replaced with a new standard: clerks may reject a slogan that is so substantially similar to another candidate's slogan that a reasonable voter could be misled into thinking the candidates are running together. An expedited appeal to Superior Court is added.

The requirement that the oval or marking space be to the left of the candidate name is changed to allow it to be to the left OR right, with new requirements that the name be aligned with the oval in a consistent manner that does not create visual distinction between candidates.

New subsection 2.a.(7) requires all office blocks on one ballot to be designed according to the same standards of design.

New subsection 2.a.(8) requires all spacing, ruling, and delineation of candidates to be consistent and uniform within each office block and across all office blocks, so as not to create a separation or visual distinction between candidate names.

New provision in R.S.19:23-17(b) allows a person or incorporated association to revoke their consent to be listed as an endorser by notifying the Secretary of State or clerk in writing before the ballot position draw date.

New provision in R.S.19:23-18(a) allows a candidate to modify, supplement, or revoke the terms of their association with other candidates by written notice to the county clerk before the ballot position draw date.

ELIGIBILITY

New subsection 3.e clarifies that nothing in the slogan/endorsement section prohibits using a single word referring to party membership or affiliation (such as 'Democrat' or 'Republican') in a candidate's slogan.

SCOPE

The provision allowing county clerks to indicate associations via common slogans is expanded from candidates for the same office to candidates 'for the same or different offices,' permitting cross-office slogan associations.

In R.S.19:23-18(b), the rule about two candidates selecting the same slogan is now limited to candidates 'seeking the same office,' narrowing when the last-filed-petition notification applies.

TECHNICAL

The ballot header requirements in R.S.19:23-24 are changed from referencing the municipal clerk to the county clerk, and 'name of county' is added to the information printed at the top of the ballot.

Floor votes · Senate Feb 25, 2025 · General Assembly Dec 19, 2024

How they voted

352
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Feb 25, 2025
D Democratic25
21 Yea 1 Nay 3
84% Yea
R Republican15
14 Yea 1 Nay
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Mar 6, 2025
Signed into law
Approved P.L.2025, c.32.
executive
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed Assembly (Passed Both Houses) (66-6-0)
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate (35-2)
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Upper · Passed
Reported out of Senate Committee with Amendments, 2nd Reading
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Committee
Transferred to Senate Judiciary Committee
upper
Jan 14, 2025
Committee
Received in the Senate, Referred to Senate State Government, Wagering, Tourism & Historic Preservation Committee
upper
Dec 19, 2024
Lower · Passed
Passed Assembly (71-1-0)
lower
Dec 16, 2024
Lower · Passed
Reported out of Assembly Committee with Amendments, 2nd Reading
lower
Dec 16, 2024
Committee
Reported out of Assembly Committee with Amendments and Referred to Assembly Appropriations Committee
lower
Dec 9, 2024
Introduced
Introduced in the Assembly, Referred to Assembly Select Committee on Ballot Design Committee
lower
4 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors