SB 545 New Hampshire Senate · 2026 Regular Session

relative to financial eligibility for the Medicare savings program.

SB 545 removes the asset limit (resource test) for New Hampshire's Medicare Savings Program, allowing seniors previously denied due to savings or assets to qualify. It also seeks federal approval to extend the low-income Medicare Part D subsidy, helping residents cover prescription drug costs. The bill directly affects approximately 2,033 additional seniors who were previously ineligible under the asset rule. This change would make program eligibility solely based on income, not savings or assets, with estimated annual state costs of $2.3 million from general funds.
Bill status failed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Nov 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Apr 2026
Governor
Introduced Nov 24, 2025 Last action Apr 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

Introduced As Amended by the Senate · 3 edits
MINOR
The Senate amendment removed the provision that would have eliminated the resource (asset) test for the Medicare Savings Program, leaving only the requirement to make the low-income subsidy for Medicare Part D available to eligible residents. This significantly narrowed the bill's scope and eliminated its estimated $5.9 million annual cost, as the fiscal note now states there is no expected fiscal impact since the subsidy is already available and fully federally funded.
ELIGIBILITY

The provision that would have eliminated the resource (asset) test for the Medicare Savings Program was removed entirely. Previously, the bill would have allowed people with higher assets to qualify for the program by disregarding their resources.

SCOPE

Subsection II was simplified from two requirements (eliminating the resource test AND making the Part D subsidy available) down to a single requirement: making the low-income subsidy for Medicare Part D available to residents, subject to CMS approval.

FISCAL

The fiscal note was completely rewritten. The introduced version estimated $5.9 million per year in new costs (split between state general funds and federal funds) due to removing asset limits. The amended version states there is no expected fiscal impact because the Part D subsidy is already available to eligible residents, is fully federally funded, and state expenditures have historically used only 55-67% of the federal allotment.

Floor votes · House Apr 23, 2026

How they voted

9594
Passed · 34 other
Total votes 223
Apr 23, 2026
D Democratic108
92 Nay 16
85% Nay
I Independent2
1 Yea 1
50% Yea
R Republican113
94 Yea 2 Nay 17
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Apr 23, 2026
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (95-94-34)
house
Apr 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Minority Committee Report: Ought to Pass
lower
Apr 15, 2026
Committee
Majority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 04/15/2026 (Vote 10-8; RC)
lower
Mar 27, 2026
Introduced
Introduced 03/26/2026 and referred to Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs HJ 9 P. 54
lower
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Amendment # 2026-1210s, AA, VV; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Ought to Pass with Amendment #2026-1210s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 03/26/2026; SJ 7
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1210s, 03/26/2026; Vote 7-0; CC; SC 11
upper
Feb 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Ought to Pass: MA, VV; Refer to Finance Rule 4-5; 02/19/2026; SJ 4
upper
Feb 12, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee Report: Ought to Pass, 02/19/2026; Vote 4-1; CC; SC 6
upper
Nov 24, 2025
Introduced
Introduced 01/07/2026 and Referred to Health and Human Services; SJ 1
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors

Sponsors