relative to non-public sessions at public meetings where discussion in public would likely affect a person's reputation.
HB 313 would allow government bodies to hold closed sessions during public meetings when discussing matters that could likely harm an individual's reputation if discussed publicly. The bill specifically targets situations where open discussion might damage someone's standing, such as in personnel matters or sensitive investigations. It directly affects local and state government entities that hold public meetings, requiring them to follow this rule when considering whether to exclude the public from specific discussions. The proposal aims to balance transparency with protecting individuals from reputational harm during official proceedings.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 8, 2025
Last action Nov 19, 2025
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Nov 19, 2025
Committee
Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate 11/12/2025 (Vote 17-0; CC)
lower
Nov 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Work Session: 11/12/2025 09:50 am GP 230
lower
Sep 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Subcommittee Work Session: 09/30/2025 11:00 am GP 228
lower
Aug 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Full Committee Work Session: 09/10/2025 10:00 am GP 230
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Retained in Committee
lower
Jan 8, 2025
Introduced
Introduced 01/08/2025 and referred to Judiciary HJ 2 P. 14
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 313
Scope: NH
Hi! I can help you understand HB 313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline