Prohibits a third-party reservation service platform provider from engaging in certain activities. (BDR 52-627)
SB 169 requires third-party reservation platforms (like booking apps for restaurants or salons) to obtain a written agreement with an establishment before listing, advertising, or selling reservations through their service. Violations would be treated as deceptive trade practices, subjecting platforms to civil penalties (up to $10,000 per violation) but not criminal charges. The law explicitly exempts document preparation services from these requirements. It directly affects online booking platforms and the businesses they connect with, aiming to ensure platforms have explicit authorization for reservation activities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Feb 3, 2025
Signed May 31, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Reprint 2
→
As Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
May 31, 2025
MINOR
The bill was finalized as 'As Enrolled' legislation, converting it from a draft reprint to an official enacted law. The most significant substantive change is the addition of a new requirement for third-party reservation platforms: they must now honor an establishment's request to opt out of future bookings. This addition clarifies the definition of a 'third-party reservation service platform' to explicitly include this opt-out obligation, ensuring businesses can control their future reservations.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's definition for 'third-party reservation service platform' was expanded to include a specific condition regarding customer opt-out rights, thereby tightening the rules for which platforms are subject to the new restrictions.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new clause (subsection (b)(2)(III)) requiring third-party platforms to honor an establishment's request to opt out of future reservations, appointments, or bookings.
DEFINITION
Incorporated the new opt-out requirement into the legal definition of a 'third-party reservation service platform' to ensure compliance with the updated rules.
TECHNICAL
Converted the document from a 'Second Reprint' draft version to the final 'As Enrolled' version, adding official chapter headers, session numbers, and the formal enactment preamble.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 21, 2025 · Assembly May 22, 2025
How they voted
20–0
Passed
Total votes 20
Apr 21, 2025
D
Democratic12
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
2
May 31, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
Chapter 178.
executive
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Assembly Amendment No. 702 concurred in. To enrollment.
lower
May 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. To reengrossment. Reengrossed. Second reprint.
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate.
In Senate.
lower
May 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 21, Nays: None.) To printer.
upper
Apr 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
Placed on Second Reading File.
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 24.)
Reprinting dispensed with.
Placed on General File.
upper
Feb 3, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FD
Fabian Doñate
DDemocratic
Co
Carrie Buck
RRepublican
Co
John Steinbeck
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 169
Scope: NV
Hi! I can help you understand SB 169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline