Establishes provisions relating to facility dogs. (BDR 4-489)
AB 302 requires courts in criminal cases or abuse/neglect proceedings to allow minor or vulnerable witnesses to use certified facility dogs for emotional support during testimony, unless the court determines it would unfairly prejudice the defendant. It also mandates that public accommodations and transportation providers admit people accompanied by facility dogs or dogs in training, similar to existing service animal protections. Facility dogs must be certified by organizations recognized by Assistance Dogs International or equivalent bodies. This bill directly affects witnesses in legal proceedings and public businesses, creating new accessibility requirements for emotional support animals in court settings.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Assembly Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2025
Last action May 17, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
As Introduced
→
Reprint 1
·
6 edits
MODERATE
This bill was reprinted with amendments that changed its focus from criminal procedure to facility dogs. The amendments clarify that courts may (rather than must) allow facility dogs for witnesses, add specific requirements for motions and certifications, and expand facility dog access to county buildings beyond just courtrooms.
Scope change
The bill's scope shifted from a general criminal procedure amendment to specifically establishing provisions for facility dogs in legal proceedings and county facilities.
ELIGIBILITY
Changed court authority from mandatory ('shall allow') to discretionary ('may allow') when permitting facility dogs for witnesses.
REQUIREMENT
Added new requirements for parties to file motions with specific information about the dog's qualifications and how it will help the witness.
Added requirement that facility dogs must be covered by adequate liability insurance.
SCOPE
Expanded facility dog access to include county and municipality buildings beyond just courtrooms for witness preparation.
ENFORCEMENT
Added immunity from liability for counties and municipalities for injuries caused by facility dogs on their property.
DEFINITION
Updated certification requirements to include nationally recognized organizations, not just internationally recognized ones.
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 22, 2025
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Apr 22, 2025
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
2
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.)
To printer.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
Placed on Second Reading File.
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 396.)
Dispensed with reprinting.
lower
Feb 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. To committee.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 302
Scope: NV
Hi! I can help you understand AB 302. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline