Requests that the Nevada Supreme Court study and adopt rules governing procedures for notifying defendants and persons who are issued a civil infraction citation of certain information. (BDR S-535)
AB 218 requires Nevada courts to establish text message notification systems for criminal defendants, people issued civil citations (such as traffic tickets), and juveniles in court. The law mandates three pre-court date reminders (7, 3, and 1 days prior), allows users to opt in/out or update contact information, and requires courts to collect valid phone numbers during arrests or citations. The Court Administrator must convene a working group to study best practices and submit annual reports on program implementation. This affects anyone involved in court proceedings needing case notifications, directly changing how courts communicate with these individuals.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2025
Last action Jun 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
As Introduced
→
Reprint 1
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill was significantly rewritten to shift from requiring the Court Administrator to establish a mandatory text message notification program to requesting the Nevada Supreme Court to study and potentially adopt rules for such notifications. The original version mandated immediate implementation with specific requirements for notifications and reporting, while the new version makes the program optional and pending further study.
Scope change
The bill's scope changed from a mandatory statewide program to a study request, meaning the text message notification system is no longer required and will depend on future Supreme Court rule adoption.
REQUIREMENT
Removed mandatory requirement for Court Administrator and courts to establish text message notification programs for defendants and children.
Added request for Nevada Supreme Court to study notification procedures and adopt rules governing them.
FISCAL
Removed language about unfunded mandates and annual reporting requirements that would have created ongoing costs.
TIMELINE
Changed from immediate implementation to a study period with no set timeline for rule adoption.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. To engrossment. Engrossed. First reprint. To committee.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. To committee.
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Committee
Prefiled.
Referred to Committee on Judiciary.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CG
Cecelia González
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 218
Scope: NV
Hi! I can help you understand AB 218. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline