Removes an exemption from provisions providing certain employees with the right to use sick leave to assist family members. (BDR 53-318)
AB 112 removes an exemption in Nevada law that previously allowed employers covered by union contracts to deny employees sick leave for family medical needs. The bill requires all private employers providing sick leave to permit employees to use it for family care, including those covered by collective bargaining agreements (union contracts), effective for new agreements or renewals after October 1, 2025. Existing union contracts signed before that date remain unaffected. The law also clarifies that employer obligations under union contracts or other policies providing better sick leave benefits remain unchanged. This directly affects unionized workers in Nevada private businesses regarding access to sick leave for family care.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Vetoed
Jun 2025
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Vetoed Jun 5, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Reprint 2
→
As Enrolled
·
2 edits
MINOR
This bill removes the exemption that previously allowed employers to ignore sick leave rules for employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. It ensures that all employees, regardless of union status, can use accrued sick leave for immediate family medical needs, provided the employer already offers such leave. The change is designed to close a loophole where unionized workers were denied family sick leave benefits that non-unionized workers received.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of the sick leave requirement to include employees covered by valid collective bargaining agreements, whereas the previous version of the bill explicitly exempted them.
ELIGIBILITY
Deleted the exemption clause that prevented the sick leave requirement from applying to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
TIMELINE
Added a grandfathering provision stating that the new requirement does not apply to collective bargaining agreements entered into before October 1, 2025, but does apply to any new or renewed agreements after that date.
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 22, 2025
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Jun 5, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
executive
May 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate Amendment No. 583 concurred in. To enrollment.
lower
May 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 15, Nays: 6.) To Assembly.
upper
May 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
upper
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved. (Yeas: 29, Nays: 13.)
To printer.
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended.
Placed on Second Reading File.
Read second time. Amended. (Amend. No. 40.)
Dispensed with reprinting.
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. To printer.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Duy Nguyen
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 112
Scope: NV
Hi! I can help you understand AB 112. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline