Revise venue laws for cases challenging constitutionality of recent laws
SB 97 revises state laws concerning where certain legal cases can be heard. It primarily affects individuals or groups who challenge the constitutionality of state laws enacted or amended within the current two-year legislative period. Under this bill, lawsuits that claim a recently passed law is unconstitutional or seek to prevent its enforcement must be filed in a county located within the legislative district of that law's primary sponsor. If such a case is initially filed elsewhere, the bill mandates a change of venue to the sponsor's legislative district.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Jan 6, 2025
Signed May 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0097_1(10).pdf
→
SB0097_X.pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill establishes a new venue rule requiring lawsuits challenging recently enacted laws to be filed in the county where the primary sponsor of that law resides. It also updates existing venue statutes to ensure consistency with this new requirement.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of venue laws to include a specific category of cases involving challenges to recently enacted legislation, shifting the proper venue from the defendant's location to the sponsor's legislative district.
ELIGIBILITY
Created a new Section 1 defining the proper place of trial for actions challenging statutes or session laws enacted within the current legislative biennium.
DEFINITION
Defined 'Challenge' to include pleading unconstitutionality or seeking an injunction, and 'Legislative biennium' as the two-year legislative period.
REQUIREMENT
Amended Sections 25-2-118, 25-2-125, 25-2-126, and 25-2-201 to add exceptions for the new challenge venue rule and to require changes of venue when such challenges are filed.
Floor votes · Senate Jan 31, 2025 · House Apr 11, 2025
How they voted
32–18
Passed
Total votes 50
Jan 31, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Nay
R
Republican32
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
9
Committee
6
May 5, 2025
Signed into law
(S) Signed by Governor
upper
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 11, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (57-42-1)
house
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 31, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-18)
senate
Jan 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 13, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 6, 2025
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
John Fuller
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 97
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 97. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline