Revise laws related to Judiciary and rule of necessity
SB 30 revises laws concerning judicial conflicts of interest and recusal for judicial officers in legal proceedings. The bill specifies that the legal doctrine of the rule of necessity cannot be used by a judicial officer to avoid recusal due to a conflict of interest if other judicial officers with less significant conflicts are available to serve as substitutes. This change aims to ensure that cases are heard by judges with minimal potential conflicts, building upon existing rules for recusal based on campaign contributions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Dec 11, 2024
Signed May 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0030_1(7).pdf
→
SB0030_X.pdf
·
1 edit
MINOR
This bill amends Montana's judicial recusal law to explicitly forbid judges from using the 'rule of necessity' to hear cases when they have a conflict of interest but other judges with fewer conflicts are available. Previously, judges could sometimes override recusal requests to ensure a case was heard, even if a conflict existed; this change removes that exception to ensure impartiality.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of judicial recusal by adding a specific prohibition on the 'rule of necessity' for conflicts of interest, whereas the prior text did not explicitly address this legal doctrine in that context.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new sentence in subsection (4) stating that a judicial officer may not use the rule of necessity to avoid recusal when other judges with less immediate or significant conflicts are available to serve as substitutes.
Floor votes · Senate Jan 27, 2025 · House Apr 11, 2025
How they voted
31–18
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Jan 27, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Nay
R
Republican32
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
9
Committee
6
May 5, 2025
Signed into law
(S) Signed by Governor
upper
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 11, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (57-42-1)
house
Mar 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 28, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-18-1)
senate
Jan 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 22, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 7, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Dec 11, 2024
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom McGillvray
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 30
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 30. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline