Revise zoning laws to clarify decisions regarding prior nonconforming use of property
SB 214 revises zoning laws to clarify decisions regarding property use and prior nonconforming uses. The bill mandates that if zoning regulations are ambiguous about a property's use or a nonconforming use, the interpretation must favor the property's use. It also removes the ability of historic preservation boards to review applications for zoning permits and variances. This legislation primarily affects property owners and local zoning authorities by establishing clearer rules for interpreting and enforcing zoning regulations.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Jan 24, 2025
Signed May 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0214_2(10).pdf
→
SB0214_X.pdf
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill clarifies Montana zoning laws by establishing that when regulations are ambiguous, courts must favor allowing existing property uses. It also updates definitions to include tiny dwelling units and modernizes the definition of manufactured housing.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of protected uses by explicitly including 'tiny dwelling units' and clarifies the legal standard for nonconforming uses across all counties and municipalities.
DEFINITION
Added 'tiny dwelling units' to the list of allowable zoning districts to encourage their development.
Updated the definition of 'manufactured housing' to align with current federal standards and explicitly exclude mobile homes.
REQUIREMENT
Changed the legal interpretation rule so that ambiguous zoning regulations must be interpreted in favor of allowing a nonconforming use, rather than favoring the free use of property in general.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed the exception that allowed historic preservation boards to review applications for zoning permits and variances.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 27, 2025 · House Apr 11, 2025
How they voted
34–16
Passed
Total votes 50
Feb 27, 2025
D
Democratic18
83% Nay
R
Republican32
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
9
Committee
6
May 5, 2025
Signed into law
(S) Signed by Governor
upper
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 11, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (50-48-2)
house
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Local Government
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 28, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-16)
senate
Feb 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Local Government
upper
Feb 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Local Government
upper
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Local Government
upper
Jan 24, 2025
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Greg Hertz
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 214
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 214. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline