SB 20 Montana Senate · 2025 Regular Session

Prohibit retired judges from hearing constitutional cases

SB 20 prohibits retired judges and justices from hearing or assisting in any court case where a party challenges the constitutionality of a Montana state statute. This bill amends two Montana Code sections (3-5-202 and 19-5-103) to explicitly ban retired judges from such cases, directly affecting retired judicial officers who might otherwise be called to assist courts. The key provision removes retired judges from participating in constitutional challenges while maintaining their ability to serve in other non-constitutional matters. The bill would have taken immediate effect upon enactment but died in committee in May 2025.
Bill status died 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Dec 7, 2024 Last action May 23, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

LC0616.pdf SB0020_1.pdf · 5 edits
MODERATE
The bill renumbered from LC 0616 to SB 20 and updated the sponsor's name. It modified the qualifications for district court judges to require 5 years of prior legal practice in Montana and clarified that judges must reside in their district during their term. Additionally, it restructured the rules for calling retired judges to duty, adding a specific exception for cases challenging state statutes and clarifying compensation limits.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains focused on judicial qualifications and the call of retired judges, but the specific eligibility criteria for judges and the procedural rules for retired judges were modified.
ELIGIBILITY

Added a requirement that district court judges must have been admitted to practice law in Montana for at least 5 years before appointment or election.

Clarified that while judges do not need to reside in their district at the time of election, they must live there throughout their term of office.

REQUIREMENT

Restructured the rules for calling retired judges to duty, explicitly prohibiting them from serving in cases where a party challenges the constitutionality of a state statute.

FISCAL

Adjusted the compensation formula for retired judges, capping daily pay at the current salary for the first 180 days and reducing pay to a fraction of the salary minus retirement benefits for days served beyond 180.

TECHNICAL

Changed the bill identifier from LC 0616 to SB 20 and updated the sponsor information.

Floor votes · Senate Feb 15, 2025 · House Apr 17, 2025

How they voted

2523
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 50
Feb 15, 2025
D Democratic18
17 Nay 1
94% Nay
R Republican32
25 Yea 6 Nay 1
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 17, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (20-0)
house
Apr 17, 2025
Amended
(H) Tabled in Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 17, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 15, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-23-2)
senate
Jan 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 24, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 7, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Dec 7, 2024
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jason Ellsworth
Jason Ellsworth
RRepublican
MT
43