Extending onsite inspection timelines during state of emergency
SB 10 revises the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act of 1975 by extending specific review timelines for emergency projects that impact streambeds. When the governor declares a state of emergency, the bill allows inspection teams 30 days, instead of the usual 20, to conduct an onsite inspection of an emergency project. Additionally, during such emergencies, team members are granted 40 days, rather than 30, to submit their recommendations for the project's approval, denial, or modification. This provides additional time for regulatory review processes specifically during periods of widespread emergency.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Nov 2024
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Nov 25, 2024
Signed Apr 18, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
SB0010_1(6).pdf
→
SB0010_X.pdf
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was finalized and enrolled, changing the status from a draft to an official legislative act. The substantive policy content remains focused on streamlining emergency project approvals, but the text was reorganized to clarify that the Governor's declaration of a state of emergency triggers specific, extended timelines for inspections and recommendations.
Scope change
The bill's scope remains unchanged in terms of subject matter, but the language was revised to explicitly link the extended timelines to the Governor's declaration of a state of emergency under 10-3-303.
TIMELINE
Extended the deadline for team members to recommend denial, approval, or modification of an emergency project from 30 days to 40 days when a state of emergency is declared.
Extended the deadline for the inspection team to conduct an onsite inspection from 20 days to 30 days when a state of emergency is declared.
Clarified that the supervisors' decision timeline remains 60 days from receipt of the emergency notice, regardless of the emergency declaration.
TECHNICAL
Reformatted the bill text to correct line breaks and ensure consistent spacing between sections.
Updated the header to reflect the bill's final status as an 'Enrolled Bill' rather than a draft version.
Floor votes · Senate Jan 27, 2025 · House Apr 1, 2025
How they voted
49–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Jan 27, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Yea
R
Republican32
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Apr 17, 2025
Signed into law
(S) Signed by Governor
upper
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 1, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (99-0-1)
house
Mar 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Local Government
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Local Government
lower
Jan 28, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Local Government
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (49-0-1)
senate
Jan 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Local Government
upper
Jan 23, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Local Government
upper
Jan 7, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Local Government
upper
Nov 25, 2024
Introduced
(S) Introduced
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Forrest Mandeville
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 10
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 10. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline