Establish compensation for wrongful conviction
HB 93 sought to establish a system for compensating individuals who were wrongly convicted of felony crimes and later exonerated. It would allow eligible claimants, defined as those imprisoned for felonies they did not commit, to file a civil action against the state or county of conviction. To receive compensation, claimants would need to prove their actual innocence by a preponderance of the evidence and waive other legal remedies against the state. The bill also provided for a $5,000 transition assistance grant, expungement of the conviction, and outlined how damages and legal costs would be paid, excluding compensation for crimes that are now legal.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2024
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Dec 16, 2024
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0093_2(16).pdf
→
HB0093_3.pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was renumbered from HB0093.2 to HB0093.3. The most significant substantive change is the increase in the burden of proof required for a claimant to receive compensation; the text now explicitly requires 'CLEAR AND CONVINCING evidence' instead of the previous 'preponderance of the evidence.' Additionally, the petition requirements were expanded to demand a 'prima facie showing' of reliable factual evidence establishing all legal elements before a claim can proceed.
Scope change
The bill's scope regarding the standard of proof for wrongful conviction claims has been tightened, making it more difficult for claimants to succeed.
REQUIREMENT
The burden of proof for compensation claims was increased from a 'preponderance of the evidence' to 'clear and convincing evidence,' raising the threshold for claimants to prove their innocence.
Petitioners must now include a 'prima facie showing' that they have reliable factual evidence establishing all legal elements of the claim.
TECHNICAL
The bill number was updated from HB0093.2 to HB0093.3, and minor formatting adjustments were made to the text structure.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 11, 2025 · House Mar 5, 2025
How they voted
26–23
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Apr 11, 2025
D
Democratic18
94% Nay
R
Republican32
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
48
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Apr 11, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-23-1)
senate
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 5, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (96-2-2)
house
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Appropriations
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Appropriations
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Committee
(H) Rereferred to Committee - (H) Appropriations
lower
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Dec 20, 2024
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Dec 16, 2024
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kerri Seekins-Crowe
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 93
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 93. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline