Provide for taxation of vapor products
HB 910 is a legislative bill that aims to provide for the taxation of vapor products. It does this by amending the existing definition of "tobacco products" in state law (Section 16-11-102, MCA) to include substances consumed with devices like e-cigarettes, vape pens, and e-hookahs, regardless of nicotine content. This change would subject vapor products to the same tax regulations as other tobacco products. The provisions of this act would apply to products sold by wholesalers after June 30, 2025.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 28, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0910_2(2).pdf
→
HB0910_2(3).pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill updated the definition of 'tobacco product' to explicitly include products containing nicotine intended for human consumption, regardless of whether they contain actual tobacco. This change broadens the scope to cover emerging nicotine delivery methods like vapes and heated tobacco products that may not strictly contain tobacco leaf but still deliver nicotine. The revision also clarifies that the definition includes substances consumed during the use of devices that deliver nicotine or other substances, such as e-cigarettes and e-hookahs.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded from traditional tobacco products to include a broader range of nicotine-containing products and devices, ensuring these new items are regulated under the same framework as cigarettes and cigars.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'tobacco product' was modified to include any product containing or derived from tobacco or containing nicotine intended for human consumption, covering methods like smoking, heating, chewing, and inhaling.
New language was added to explicitly include substances consumed during the use of devices that deliver nicotine or other substances, such as e-cigarettes, e-cigars, e-pipes, vape pens, and e-hookahs.
The definition was updated to remove specific examples like 'snus' from the primary list and instead group them under the broader 'including but not limited to' clause for clarity and future-proofing.
Floor votes · House Apr 3, 2025
How they voted
20–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 23
Apr 3, 2025
D
Democratic10
80% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Apr 3, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (20-0-3)
house
Apr 3, 2025
Amended
(H) Tabled in Committee - (H) Appropriations
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Committee
(H) Rereferred to Committee - (H) Appropriations
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Appropriations
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Taxation
lower
Mar 29, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Taxation
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mary Caferro
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 910
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 910. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline