Revise the Montana driver privacy protection act
HB 662 revises the Montana Driver Privacy Protection Act to strengthen privacy protections for individuals' motor vehicle records. The bill requires that "express consent" for disclosing personal information must be obtained on a specific form prescribed by the Department of Motor Vehicles. It also allows individuals to file individual or class action lawsuits against "requesters" who misuse this disclosed information. These lawsuits can seek punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney fees, and the department would be required to maintain a list of all requesters.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Failed
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
LC0908.pdf
→
HB0662_1.pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was renumbered from LC 0908 to HB 662.1 and expanded to include a new Section 1 that allows individuals to sue requesters for misuse of driver privacy data, including class action lawsuits with punitive damages. The definitions section was updated to clarify that electronic consent is valid if it includes an electronic signature. The permitted disclosure rules for social security numbers and business use remain largely unchanged.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to include a new enforcement mechanism (private right of action) and clarified consent methods, while the core rules for who can access driver records remained the same.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new Section 1 allowing individuals harmed by privacy violations to sue requesters for punitive damages, costs, and attorney fees, including the option for class action lawsuits.
DEFINITION
Updated the definition of 'express consent' to explicitly state that consent can be conveyed electronically if it includes an electronic signature as defined by state law.
TECHNICAL
Changed the bill identifier from LC 0908 to HB 662.1 and adjusted the list of sponsors to reflect the current legislative session.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 11, 2025 · House Mar 7, 2025
How they voted
23–25
Failed · 2 other
Total votes 50
Apr 11, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Yea
R
Republican32
78% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Apr 11, 2025
Vote failed
Senate Vote: fail (23-25-2)
senate
Apr 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Taken from Table in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 7, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (98-1-1)
house
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 662
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 662. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline