Revising marijuana election requirements in certain municipalities
HB 659 aimed to revise the election requirements for approving or prohibiting marijuana businesses in certain municipalities. The bill would have applied to "qualified municipalities" - cities or towns with their own police departments - located within counties that previously voted against Initiative Measure No. 190. A key provision was that a two-thirds majority vote would be required within such a qualified municipality to either approve or prohibit specific categories of marijuana businesses from operating there. This mechanism would have allowed these municipalities to make their own decisions regarding marijuana businesses, even if the surrounding county had a different outcome.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Failed
Mar 2025
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0659_1(5).pdf
→
HB0659_2.pdf
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill includes minor formatting updates and a critical correction to a repetitive phrase in the text. The most significant change is the addition of the word 'THE' in line 21, which clarifies that the two-thirds vote requirement applies specifically to 'THE municipality' rather than a generic 'a qualified municipality'. This ensures the legal requirement is applied correctly to the specific local jurisdiction.
Scope change
No substantive change to the bill's scope or applicability; the change is a textual clarification.
TECHNICAL
Added the word 'THE' to line 21 to correct a repetitive phrase ('in the a qualified') and clarify that the vote requirement applies to the specific municipality.
Updated bill numbering from 'HB 659.1' to 'HB0659.2' and adjusted header formatting.
Floor votes · House Mar 6, 2025
How they voted
47–52
Failed · 1 other
Total votes 100
Mar 6, 2025
D
Democratic42
100% Nay
R
Republican58
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Mar 6, 2025
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (47-52-1)
house
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) State Administration
lower
Mar 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) State Administration
lower
Feb 22, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) State Administration
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jedediah Hinkle
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 659
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 659. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline