Revise criminal laws related to strip searches
HB 605 proposed revisions to criminal laws concerning strip searches for individuals entering correctional facilities. The bill would have allowed a person to be subjected to a strip search if they were to be housed in a jail or correctional facility for more than 12 hours. This provision would have created an exception to the existing requirement that individuals arrested for traffic or non-felony offenses can only be strip-searched if there is reasonable suspicion they are concealing a weapon, contraband, or evidence. The change would have permitted strip searches based on the anticipated length of detention, regardless of the initial offense type or specific suspicion for the search.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Vetoed
May 2025
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Vetoed May 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 9 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0605GovVeto.pdf
→
HB0605_X(8).pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill text was reformatted from a veto request letter to the Governor into the official enrolled bill text. The substantive policy content remains the same: it allows strip searches for individuals held in jail or correctional facilities for more than 12 hours, requires reasonable suspicion for traffic or non-felony offenses, and mandates a $250 fee from each county to fund strip search guidelines.
Scope change
The document scope changed from a veto recommendation letter to the official enrolled bill text, but the legislative content and applicability remain unchanged.
TECHNICAL
The document was converted from a veto letter to the Governor into the official enrolled bill format, removing the letter content and adding bill certification signatures.
Official bill header information including enrolled bill certification, signatures for House and Senate, and bill introduction sponsors were added.
The veto request letter content from the Montana Sheriffs & Peace Officers Association was removed as it was not part of the final bill text.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 22, 2025 · House Apr 25, 2025
How they voted
34–16
Passed
Total votes 50
Apr 22, 2025
D
Democratic18
61% Nay
R
Republican32
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
45
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
2
May 13, 2025
Vetoed
(H) Vetoed by Governor
lower
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
May 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 25, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (62-38)
house
Apr 23, 2025
Introduced
(S) Returned to House with Amendments
upper
Apr 22, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-16)
senate
Apr 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Apr 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Apr 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Taken from Table in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Taken from Table in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 14, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
George Nikolakakos
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 605
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 605. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline