Revise municipal zoning laws related to parking requirements
HB 492 revises municipal zoning laws by setting new limits on the minimum parking space requirements local governments can impose on new developments. The bill generally caps required parking for residential units at one space per unit and for commercial spaces at one space per 5,000 square feet, with specific exemptions for certain types of projects like affordable housing or smaller commercial spaces. If a city or town chooses to require more parking than these new limits, it must compensate the developer or property owner for the real cost of constructing the additional spaces. This legislation directly affects municipal zoning authorities and developers within those areas.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
May 2025
Signed into Law
May 2025
Introduced Feb 13, 2025
Signed May 19, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0492_X(1).pdf
→
HB0492_X(2).pdf
·
5 edits
MODERATE
This bill removes a requirement for developers to compensate municipalities for providing extra parking spaces, allowing them to build more than the minimum required. It also amends zoning laws to strictly limit the number of parking spaces required for residential units and specific facility types, while adding new definitions for housing categories.
Scope change
The bill expands the ability of property owners and developers to exceed minimum parking requirements without penalty and clarifies zoning rules for specific housing types like duplexes and mixed-use developments.
REQUIREMENT
Eliminated the mandate requiring developers to pay compensation to cities or towns when they provide more parking spaces than the minimum required by zoning.
Updated zoning criteria to explicitly prohibit requiring more than one parking space per residential dwelling unit.
Added exemptions from minimum parking requirements for existing buildings, child-care facilities, deed-restricted affordable housing, and assisted living facilities.
Added restrictions preventing local governments from treating manufactured housing differently or requiring fees/dedications for affordable housing.
DEFINITION
Introduced new definitions for 'duplex housing,' 'family unit,' 'mixed-use development,' and 'multiple-unit dwelling' to clarify zoning application.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 12, 2025 · House Apr 17, 2025
How they voted
46–4
Passed
Total votes 50
Apr 12, 2025
D
Democratic18
83% Yea
R
Republican32
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
46
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 13, 2025
Signed into law
(H) Signed by Governor
lower
May 6, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
May 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Apr 17, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (73-26-1)
house
Apr 12, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (46-4)
senate
Apr 12, 2025
Introduced
(S) Returned to House with Amendments
upper
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Local Government
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Local Government
upper
Mar 21, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Local Government
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 13, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 13, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Katie Zolnikov
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 492
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 492. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline