HB 409: Revise injunction laws - Montana

HB0409_3(11).pdf → HB0409_X(1).pdf · 3 edits

MINOR

This bill amends Montana's law on preliminary injunctions to strictly prohibit courts from using 'sliding scale' or 'serious questions' tests, requiring judges to evaluate the four legal criteria independently instead. The change ensures Montana courts follow United States Supreme Court precedent rather than the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' approach, which previously allowed for a more flexible, multi-factor analysis. This update clarifies legislative intent to prevent courts from weighing factors against each other, thereby standardizing how temporary legal relief is granted.

Scope change

The bill's scope remains focused on Montana courts' procedures for granting preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, but it significantly alters the analytical framework judges must use when deciding these cases.

REQUIREMENT

Prohibits courts from using sliding scale tests, serious questions tests, flexible interplay, or other federal circuit modifications when analyzing injunction applications.

Mandates that courts examine the four statutory criteria for injunctions independently rather than weighing them against one another.

TIMELINE

Establishes an immediate effective date for the new procedural requirements.

HB0409_X.pdf → HB0409_3(11).pdf · 1 edit

MINOR

The bill was renumbered from HB 409 to HB 409.3 and its text was reorganized to separate the statutory language from the bill title and introductory clauses. The core legal requirements regarding preliminary injunctions, including the prohibition on sliding scale tests, remain substantively unchanged.

TECHNICAL

The bill number was updated from HB 409 to HB 409.3, and the document structure was altered to move the bill title and sponsor information to the top of the page.

HB0409_3(10).pdf → HB0409_X.pdf · 1 edit

MINOR

The bill was updated from a draft version to an enrolled version, indicating it has passed both legislative chambers and is ready for the governor's signature. The substantive policy content remains identical, prohibiting courts from using 'sliding scale' or 'serious questions' tests when deciding on preliminary injunctions, requiring instead that all four legal criteria be evaluated independently.

TECHNICAL

The document format changed from a draft 'Authorized Print Version' to a final 'Enrolled Bill' with added certification signatures for the Chief Clerk, Speaker of the House, and President of the Senate.

HB0409_4.pdf → HB0409_3(10).pdf · 3 edits

MINOR

The bill was renumbered from HB 409 to HB 409.3 and its title was expanded to explicitly include 'Temporary Restraining Orders' alongside preliminary injunctions. The core legal text prohibiting courts from using 'sliding scale' or 'serious questions' tests remains largely the same, but the formatting was updated to align with the new bill number.

Scope change

The scope of the bill was slightly expanded to explicitly cover temporary restraining orders in addition to preliminary injunctions, ensuring the prohibition on specific legal tests applies to both types of court orders.

TECHNICAL

The bill number was changed from HB 409 to HB 409.3, indicating a revision or amendment to the original draft.

New line numbers and formatting were inserted throughout the document to reflect the changes in the bill number and title.

SCOPE

The bill title was updated to explicitly mention 'Temporary Restraining Orders,' clarifying that the restrictions on court testing methods apply to both preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders.

HB0409_3(9).pdf → HB0409_4.pdf · 3 edits

MINOR

This bill updates the legal standard for granting preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders in Montana. It explicitly prohibits courts from using the 'serious questions test' or any 'sliding scale' approach, requiring judges to evaluate the four required legal criteria independently instead. The change ensures that Montana courts follow United States Supreme Court precedent rather than relying on interpretations from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Scope change

The bill applies to all Montana courts considering applications for preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders, specifically restricting the analytical methods judges may use.

REQUIREMENT

Prohibits courts from using the 'serious questions test' or 'sliding scale test' when evaluating injunction applications.

Requires courts to examine the four legal criteria for injunctions independently rather than weighing them against each other.

Clarifies that the legal standard must follow United States Supreme Court case law instead of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decisions.

HB0409_3(4).pdf → HB0409_3(5).pdf · 1 edit

MINOR

The bill includes a minor formatting correction to the numbering of subsections, changing '(4)(5)' to '(4)(5)(4)'. There are no substantive policy changes, such as new requirements, funding adjustments, or eligibility criteria. The change is purely technical and does not affect the bill's legal effect.

TECHNICAL

Corrected the numbering sequence in a legislative intent clause to ensure proper formatting.

HB0409_2(12).pdf → HB0409_3.pdf · 2 edits

MINOR

The bill number was updated from HB 409.2 to HB 409.3, indicating a revision or new version of the legislation. A significant substantive change was made to the legal standard for preliminary injunctions, removing references to a 'sliding scale test' and the 'serious questions test' to align the state's interpretation strictly with federal standards. These changes clarify the legal threshold for granting temporary court orders, ensuring consistency with federal law and removing previous ambiguity.

Scope change

The bill's scope regarding preliminary injunctions was narrowed by explicitly prohibiting the use of specific legal tests (sliding scale and serious questions) that were previously applicable.

REQUIREMENT

Removed the 'sliding scale test' and 'serious questions test' from the preliminary injunction standard, requiring courts to follow federal standards exclusively.

TECHNICAL

Updated the bill identifier from HB 409.2 to HB 409.3 and adjusted page numbering formatting.

HB0409_1(5).pdf → HB0409_2.pdf · 2 edits

MINOR

The bill was renumbered from HB 409.1 to HB 0409.2 and updated its effective date language. The most significant change is the addition of strict instructions for courts, requiring them to evaluate legal criteria independently without using flexible 'sliding scale' or 'serious questions' tests that are sometimes used in federal courts.

TECHNICAL

The bill number was changed from HB 409.1 to HB 0409.2, and the header formatting was adjusted.

REQUIREMENT

New instructions were added requiring courts to examine legal criteria independently and explicitly prohibiting the use of 'sliding scale' or 'serious questions' tests during preliminary injunction analysis.

LC2373.pdf → HB0409_1.pdf · 2 edits

MINOR

The bill number was officially changed from LC 2373 to HB 409.1, and the document title was updated to reflect it as an 'Authorized Print Version'. The substantive text regarding court injunction standards remains unchanged, with only minor formatting adjustments to spacing and line numbering.

TECHNICAL

Bill number and title were updated from LC 2373 to HB 409.1 to reflect the official House Bill designation.

Minor formatting changes were made to spacing and line numbering throughout the document.

Revise injunction laws

What changed between versions

How they voted

Actions timeline

Sponsors