Establish a grant program for aquatic recreational facilities
HB 313 aimed to establish a grant program to provide funding for public swimming pools operated by local governments and nonprofit organizations. It would have created a "public swimming pool infrastructure account" and appropriated $5 million from the state general fund, to be administered by the Department of Commerce. These grants were intended to support capital construction, maintenance, repair projects, and equipment purchases for eligible aquatic facilities. Grants of $25,000 or more would have required a 1:5 match, and funding was limited to $1 million per county and $500,000 per project.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 24, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0313_4(5).pdf
→
HB0313_5.pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was renumbered from HB 313.4 to HB 313.5. The most significant policy change is the addition of a requirement for matching funds, where recipients must provide one dollar of private funding for every dollar of state grant money received. Additionally, the text regarding the use of funds for operational costs was modified to clarify that grants are strictly limited to specific operational expenses like staffing, utilities, and insurance for the first five years of a pool's operation.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed regarding operational funding; grants can now only be used for specific operational costs within the first five years of a pool's operation, rather than broadly for operational costs.
FISCAL
Added a mandatory one-to-one matching fund requirement, requiring recipients to contribute private dollars for every state dollar received.
Restricted the use of grant funds for operational costs to a maximum of one year within the first five years of the pool's operation.
TECHNICAL
The bill number was updated from HB 313.4 to HB 313.5.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 23, 2025 · House Apr 5, 2025
How they voted
27–20
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 50
Apr 23, 2025
D
Democratic18
83% Nay
R
Republican32
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
49
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Apr 23, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-20-3)
senate
Apr 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Finance and Claims
upper
Apr 18, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Finance and Claims
upper
Apr 16, 2025
Committee
(S) Rereferred to Committee - (S) Finance and Claims
upper
Apr 15, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Local Government
upper
Apr 14, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Local Government
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Local Government
upper
Apr 5, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (63-35-2)
house
Mar 29, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Appropriations
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Appropriations
lower
Feb 13, 2025
Committee
(H) Rereferred to Committee - (H) Appropriations
lower
Feb 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Local Government
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Local Government
lower
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Local Government
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Paul Tuss
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 313
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline