Revise laws related to judicial transparency and elections
HB 295, titled "Revise laws related to judicial transparency and elections," sought to change rules for judicial candidates in elections. The bill would have allowed candidates for judicial office to indicate a political party affiliation on their declaration for nomination. This affiliation would then be permitted to appear on the election ballot alongside the candidate's name. Additionally, the bill would have allowed judicial candidates to publicly announce their political party affiliations and any campaign endorsements they received.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
House Failed
Feb 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 23, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
LC3030.pdf
→
HB0295_1.pdf
·
4 edits
MODERATE
This bill revises Montana laws to allow judicial candidates to voluntarily indicate their political party affiliation on nomination declarations and to announce party affiliations or endorsements on their campaign materials. It updates ballot preparation rules to display party names next to judicial candidates' names and clarifies how nonpartisan offices are handled on ballots.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of judicial election transparency by permitting candidates to disclose party affiliation, whereas previous rules were more restrictive regarding such disclosures for judicial offices.
REQUIREMENT
Judicial candidates are now permitted to indicate their political party affiliation on their declaration for nomination.
Judicial candidates are allowed to announce their political party affiliation or any campaign endorsements they have received.
Ballot preparation rules were updated to require the candidate's political party name to appear with their name if they indicated an affiliation on their declaration.
The statute governing the use of party names was amended to clarify rules for candidates running in partisan versus nonpartisan elections.
Floor votes · House Feb 27, 2025
How they voted
47–53
Failed
Total votes 100
Feb 27, 2025
D
Democratic42
100% Nay
R
Republican58
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Feb 27, 2025
Vote failed
House Vote: fail (47-53)
house
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Paul Fielder
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 295
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 295. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline