HB 289 Montana House · 2025 Regular Session

Revise crime laws

HB 289 aimed to revise Montana's crime laws by expanding the definition of the offense of endangering the welfare of children. The bill sought to include situations where a child is exposed to the production, manufacture, or direct presence of fentanyl, heroin, or cocaine. This would apply to individuals who knowingly engage in these activities in locations where children might reasonably be present. Violations under this specific provision would be classified as a felony, carrying potential penalties of imprisonment, fines, or both.
Bill status died 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
House Passage
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2025 Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

HB0289_2(10).pdf HB0289_3.pdf · 3 edits
MINOR
The bill number was updated from HB 289.2 to HB 289.3, indicating a revision in the legislative process. The most significant substantive change involves expanding the definition of drug paraphernalia to explicitly include items used for the injection, ingestion, or inhalation of methamphetamine, fentanyl, heroin, or cocaine. This clarification strengthens the legal definition to better address modern drug use methods. The text also shows a reorganization of the protective order provisions, though the core legal requirements for orders of protection and penalties for violations appear to remain substantively the same.
Scope change
The bill's scope was slightly expanded by clarifying the definition of drug paraphernalia to explicitly cover items used for injection, ingestion, or inhalation of specific drugs, making the law more precise in addressing current drug consumption methods.
DEFINITION

Drug paraphernalia definition was expanded to explicitly include items used for injection, ingestion, or inhalation of methamphetamine, fentanyl, heroin, or cocaine.

TECHNICAL

Bill number was updated from HB 289.2 to HB 289.3, indicating a revision in the legislative process.

Text structure was reorganized with changes in line numbering and formatting, but core legal provisions for protective orders and penalties appear unchanged.

Floor votes · House Feb 12, 2025

How they voted

1000
Passed
Total votes 100
Feb 12, 2025
D Democratic42
42 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican58
58 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 28, 2025
Amended
(S) Tabled in Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 21, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 12, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (100-0)
house
Feb 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Feb 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 22, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Courtenay Sprunger
Courtenay Sprunger
RRepublican
MT
7