HB 173 Montana House · 2025 Regular Session

Revise definition of victim in youth court act

HB 173 revises the definitions within the Montana Youth Court Act. It specifically expands the definition of a "victim" to include a corporation or other entity. This change allows businesses or organizations to be formally recognized as victims in cases handled by the youth court. The bill amends existing state law to incorporate this broader definition.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Apr 2025
Signed into Law
Apr 2025
Introduced Jan 10, 2025 Signed Apr 18, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 9 comparisons

What changed between versions

HB0173_2(12).pdf HB0173_X.pdf · 5 edits
MODERATE
This bill updates the Montana Youth Court Act definitions to clarify who counts as a 'victim' (now including corporations) and modernizes terminology for facilities and procedures. It also refines the definition of 'detention' to cover the entire period from initial custody to final court decision, ensuring consistent legal language across the state's juvenile justice system.
Scope change
The bill expands the definition of 'victim' to include corporations and other entities, broadening the scope of who can seek protection under the Youth Court Act.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'victim' was expanded to explicitly include corporations or other entities, not just individuals.

The definition of 'detention' was clarified to cover the full period from when a youth is taken into custody until the final disposition of their case, rather than just specific interim steps.

The definition of 'correctional facility' was updated to allow the Department of Corrections to set specific conditions for which populations can be housed in such facilities via administrative rules.

The definition of 'detention facility' was refined to specify that it is a physically restricting facility designed to prevent a youth from leaving at will.

The definition of 'holdover' was updated to describe it as a physically unrestricting setting approved for temporary detention and supervision.

Floor votes · Senate Mar 27, 2025 · House Jan 29, 2025

How they voted

3218
Passed
Total votes 50
Mar 27, 2025
D Democratic18
18 Nay
100% Nay
R Republican32
32 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
39
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Apr 17, 2025
Signed into law
(H) Signed by Governor
lower
Apr 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Signed by President
upper
Apr 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Signed by Speaker
lower
Mar 27, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-18)
senate
Mar 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Mar 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 29, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (59-41)
house
Jan 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 13, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 10, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Neil Duram
Neil Duram
RRepublican
MT
1