Revise judicial conduct laws
HB 169 would have revised Montana's judicial conduct rules to permit judges and judicial candidates to engage in political activities previously restricted. It allowed them to attend partisan events, seek endorsements from political groups, campaign with party designations, make public endorsements for nonjudicial candidates, and solicit political contributions. The bill aimed to align judicial conduct standards with broader political participation norms. This legislation died in process in the Montana House on May 22, 2025, and did not become law.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
House Passage
Jan 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 10, 2025
Last action May 22, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
HB0169_1(8).pdf
→
HB0169_2(12).pdf
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill underwent significant reformatting and the addition of a severability clause, while the core text regarding judicial conduct was renumbered with new letter designations. The most notable substantive addition is a new Section 3 on Severability, which ensures that if any part of the law is declared unconstitutional, the remaining parts will still remain in effect. The changes to the conduct rules are primarily structural, renumbering the list of permitted activities for judges and judicial candidates from a flat list to a nested format using letters and sub-letters, without altering the underlying permissions.
Scope change
The scope of the bill's applicability remains focused on the conduct of judges and judicial candidates, but the addition of the severability clause provides a legal safeguard for the bill's enforceability.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new Section 3 titled 'Severability' to ensure that if any part of the act is found invalid, the rest of the bill remains in force.
TECHNICAL
Reformatted the list of permitted activities for judges by changing the lettering scheme from (a)-(e) to (a), (b)(A), (c)(B), (d)(C), and (e)(D) to accommodate new text or structure.
Updated the header information to reflect a different bill number format (HB0169.2) and adjusted page numbering and layout.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 15, 2025 · House Jan 24, 2025
How they voted
29–20
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 50
Mar 15, 2025
D
Democratic18
100% Yea
R
Republican32
62% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Mar 15, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-20-1)
senate
Feb 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Report - (S) Judiciary
upper
Feb 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
(S) Committee Executive Action - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 27, 2025
Committee
(S) Referred to Committee - (S) Judiciary
upper
Jan 24, 2025
House · Passed
House Vote: pass (56-42-2)
house
Jan 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Report - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
(H) Committee Executive Action - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 10, 2025
Committee
(H) Referred to Committee - (H) Judiciary
lower
Jan 10, 2025
Introduced
(H) Introduced
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Millett
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 169
Scope: MT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 169. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline