Creates provisions relating to utility facility relocation
Summary
SS/SCS/SB 1065 - The act modifies and creates new provisions relating to utility facility relocation. The State Road Fund shall be used for reimbursing for certain utility relocation costs, as described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse non-rate-regulated providers for any labor costs associated with facility relocation that are required due to road maintenance, construction, or other right-of-way work activity. Notification requirements by the Department and response requirements by the non-rate-regulated provider are described in the act. The Department of Transportation shall reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the provider's labor costs for the facility relocation not to exceed specific amounts described in the act. This provision shall expire on July 1, 2031. A non-rate-regulated provider shall provide invoices to the Department for the provider's labor costs for the fiscal year in which such work occurs. Payment of the invoices is described in the act. If a provider's total labor costs exceed the specified amounts under the act, such payments shall be prorated. The Department shall be required to publicly disclose on an annual basis no later than July 31st a list of facility reimbursement invoices received, as described in the act. The act shall not require the Department to reimburse a non-rate-regulated provider for the removal or relocation of facilities placed in the public right-of-way in violation of state law or local permitting requirements. Under the act, subject to certain exceptions, the removal and relocation of utility facilities as a result of construction projects required by the Highways and Transportation Commission shall be made at the expense of the owners unless otherwise provided by the Commission. Currently, if the owner fails to relocate the utility facilities, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be collected from the owner. Under the act, the cost of relocating the utility facilities shall be the responsibility of the Commission or the owner. JULIA SHEVELEVA
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 1, 2025
Last action May 15, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
4/20/2026 - SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (McCreery)--(4816S12.01S)
4/20/2026 - Adopted
→
4/20/2026 - SA 2 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Brown-26)--(4816S12.02S)
4/20/2026 - Adopted
·
3 edits
MINOR
The amendment replaces the previous proposal to add new definitions for electric transmission and highway colocation with changes that update specific dates and numerical values throughout the bill. This shifts the focus from establishing new infrastructure rules to adjusting existing timelines and thresholds, likely to align with different legislative or project schedules.
Scope change
The bill's scope shifted from adding new substantive definitions regarding utility colocation to modifying existing dates and numerical limits within the text.
DEFINITION
Removed a proposal to define 'electric transmission facilities' and 'highway' and establish rules for colocation within highway rights-of-way.
TIMELINE
Changed the number 'Fifteen' to 'Twenty-five' in multiple instances, altering specific timeframes or quantities in the legislation.
Updated the deadline date from 2031 to 2029 and inserted 'June 30, 2029' as a specific cutoff date.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Apr 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
SA 2 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Brown-26)--(4816S12.02S)
upper
Apr 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (McCreery)--(4816S12.01S)
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported from S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee w/SCS
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
SCS Voted Do Pass S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee (4816S.02C)
upper
Feb 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Hearing Conducted S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Hearing Cancelled S Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy & the Environment Committee
upper
Dec 1, 2025
Introduced
Prefiled
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ben Brown
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1065
Scope: MO
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1065. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline