Meat and cell-cultivated dairy products; revise the MS Dept. of Ag and Commerce's regulatory authority regarding.
HB 1153 prohibits the manufacture, sale, or offer for sale of cell-cultivated dairy products in Mississippi. It expands definitions to clarify terms like "cell-cultured dairy product" and "cultivated-protein food product," requiring retailers and food service establishments to provide clear consumer disclosures about product authenticity at the point of sale. The bill also strengthens the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce’s regulatory authority, including enforcement powers, inspection procedures, and civil penalties for violations related to labeling and misbranding of meat and non-meat products. State agencies, public schools, and institutions of higher learning must adopt procurement policies preventing the purchase of misbranded or cultivated-protein food products.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
Signed Mar 23, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
As Passed the lower
→
Current version
·
3 edits
MINOR
HB 1153 moved from 'As Passed the House' to 'As Sent to Governor,' indicating it passed both chambers. Three substantive changes were made: a clarifying phrase was added to make explicit that a food product is 'not misbranded' when a qualifying term appears near an identifying meat term; the provision allowing the department to hire outside counsel (with deficit appropriation reimbursement) if the Attorney General declines to enforce stop orders was removed; and civil penalties are now deposited in the State General Fund rather than a special fund dedicated to the department's expenses.
REQUIREMENT
Section 75-36-5(e)(2) now explicitly states 'a food product is not misbranded if the label contains a conspicuous and prominent qualifying term in close proximity to an identifying meat term,' rather than leaving the legal effect implicit.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed the provision in Section 75-36-7(4) that allowed the department to hire outside counsel at its discretion if the Attorney General declined to enforce a stop order or embargo order, along with the deficit appropriation reimbursement mechanism for those fees.
FISCAL
Civil penalties under Section 75-36-9(3) are now deposited in the State General Fund instead of a special fund in the State Treasury dedicated to the department's expenses for enforcing this chapter.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 10, 2026 · House Feb 4, 2026
How they voted
52–0
Passed
Total votes 52
Mar 10, 2026
D
Democratic18
100% Yea
R
Republican34
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
Concurred in Amend From Senate
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed As Amended
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amended
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Title Suff Do Pass As Amended
upper
Feb 17, 2026
Committee
Referred To Agriculture;Appropriations
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Introduced
Transmitted To Senate
lower
Feb 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Title Suff Do Pass
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Committee
Referred To Agriculture
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Pigott
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1153
Scope: MS
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1153. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline