Elections: campaign practices; individual circulating a petition; prohibit from being paid for each petition signature collected, and require petition circulators to be paid an hourly wage. Amends 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.1 - 168.992) by adding secs. 483b, 544g, 590i & 957a.
SB 529 prohibits paying individuals who collect signatures for election petitions a fixed amount per signature or per completed petition sheet. Instead, it requires petition circulators to be paid an hourly wage for their work. This law directly affects people employed to gather signatures for campaign petitions, nominating petitions, qualifying petitions, or recall petitions in Michigan. The bill amends Michigan's election law to ensure circulators are compensated based on time worked, not the number of signatures collected.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Sep 2025
Committee Review
Nov 2025
Senate Passage
Nov 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Sep 4, 2025
Last action Nov 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Senate Introduced Bill
→
As Passed by the Senate
·
4 edits
·
Nov 13, 2025
MODERATE
This bill adds four new sections to Michigan's election law that prohibit paying individuals a fixed rate or amount for each petition signature they collect. The changes apply to petition circulation for elections, nominations, qualifications, and recalls, ensuring petition circulators are not compensated per signature.
Scope change
The bill expands legal protections to cover four types of petition circulation activities that were not explicitly addressed in the original version.
REQUIREMENT
Added Section 483b prohibiting payment of fixed rates for petition signature collection under section 482.
Added Section 544g prohibiting payment of fixed rates for nominating petition signature collection.
Added Section 590i prohibiting payment of fixed rates for qualifying petition signature collection.
Added Section 957a prohibiting payment of fixed rates for recall petition signature collection under the chapter.
Floor votes · Senate Nov 13, 2025
How they voted
21–16
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
Nov 13, 2025
D
Democratic19
100% Yea
R
Republican19
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Nov 13, 2025
Committee
referred to Committee on Election Integrity
lower
Nov 13, 2025
Introduced
received on 11/13/2025
lower
Nov 13, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED ROLL CALL # 294 YEAS 21 NAYS 15 EXCUSED 1 NOT VOTING 0
upper
Sep 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
upper
Sep 11, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
upper
Sep 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 9/10/2025
upper
Sep 4, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND ETHICS
upper
Sep 4, 2025
Introduced
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR JEREMY MOSS
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jeremy Moss
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 529
Scope: MI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 529. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline