Consumer protection: identity theft; references to identity theft protection act in code of criminal procedure; update. Amends sec. 10c, ch. II of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 762.10c). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0360'25
SB 364 updates Michigan's criminal procedure code to clarify jurisdiction rules for prosecuting identity theft cases. It specifies that identity theft violations under the Identity Theft Protection Act (2004 PA 452) and related laws can be prosecuted in three locations: where the crime occurred, where stolen data was used, or where the victim lives. The bill also ensures that if multiple identity theft violations are charged, any jurisdiction can handle all charges together, preventing fragmented prosecutions. This change directly affects prosecutors and courts handling identity theft cases under the listed statutes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jun 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Senate Passage
Aug 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jun 5, 2025
Last action Aug 26, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Senate Introduced Bill
→
As Passed by the Senate
·
4 edits
·
Aug 26, 2025
MODERATE
This bill amends the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure to clarify where identity theft and related crimes can be prosecuted. It adds specific jurisdictions for prosecution based on where illegal information was used and where the victim lives, expanding the options for law enforcement beyond just the location of the crime. The bill also updates the list of specific laws covered by these jurisdiction rules and clarifies how multiple charges across different locations should be handled.
Scope change
The scope of prosecutable jurisdictions was expanded to include the location where stolen information was used and the victim's residence, in addition to the location where the offense occurred.
ENFORCEMENT
Added a new jurisdiction for prosecution where the information used to commit the violation was illegally used.
Added a new jurisdiction for prosecution where the victim resides.
Reorganized the statute to clearly list all applicable laws and jurisdictions in a structured format.
Clarified that if a person faces multiple charges across different jurisdictions, any of those jurisdictions can prosecute all violations.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Aug 26, 2025
Committee
referred to Committee on Government Operations
lower
Aug 26, 2025
Introduced
received on 08/26/2025
lower
Aug 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED ROLL CALL # 216 YEAS 19 NAYS 15 EXCUSED 3 NOT VOTING 0
upper
Jun 26, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
upper
Jun 12, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
upper
Jun 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 6/11/2025
upper
Jun 5, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
upper
Jun 5, 2025
Introduced
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR MARY CAVANAGH
upper
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 364
Scope: MI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 364. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline