State management: funds; cap and distribution of funds in the disaster and contingency fund; modify, and create new fund. Amends title & secs. 18 & 19 of 1976 PA 390 (MCL 30.418 & 30.419) & adds sec. 18a.
SB 109 changes how Michigan manages disaster and contingency funds. It sets a spending cap on these funds and modifies rules for distributing money during emergencies. The bill also creates a new dedicated fund to handle disaster-related expenses. These changes directly affect state agencies that administer emergency funding, ensuring clearer budget limits and a separate funding stream for disasters. The bill focuses on structural management of funds, not specific policy outcomes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Sep 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2025
Last action Sep 26, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
As Passed by the Senate
→
Substitute (S-1)
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill was revised to change how money moves from the emergency contingency fund to the new hazard mitigation fund, shifting from a fixed annual transfer to a percentage-based calculation. Additionally, the eligibility criteria for receiving hazard mitigation grants were expanded to explicitly include local governments and federally recognized tribal governments alongside state agencies.
Scope change
The scope of funding eligibility was broadened to include local and tribal governments, and the mechanism for transferring funds between state accounts was altered to be more flexible based on remaining balances.
FISCAL
The rule for transferring money from the disaster and emergency contingency fund to the state hazard mitigation fund was changed from a fixed $500,000 annual transfer to a ratio where $500,000 is transferred for every $10,000,000 remaining in the source fund.
ELIGIBILITY
New criteria were added to explicitly list local governments and federally recognized tribal governments as eligible entities to apply for hazard mitigation grants.
Floor votes · Senate Sep 25, 2025
How they voted
24–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
Sep 25, 2025
D
Democratic19
100% Yea
R
Republican19
68% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 26, 2025
Committee
referred to Committee on Appropriations
lower
Sep 25, 2025
Introduced
received on 09/25/2025
lower
Sep 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
PASSED ROLL CALL # 238 YEAS 24 NAYS 12 EXCUSED 1 NOT VOTING 0
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Amended
AMENDMENT(S) DEFEATED
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
SUBSTITUTE (S-1) AS AMENDED CONCURRED IN
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1) AND AMENDMENT(S)
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1)
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IMMEDIATE EFFECT
upper
Sep 25, 2025
Upper · Passed
REPORTED FAVORABLY WITH SUBSTITUTE (S-1) 9/24/2025
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Committee
REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Introduced
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SEAN MCCANN
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sean McCann
DDemocratic
Co
Paul Wojno
DDemocratic
Co
Rosemary Bayer
DDemocratic
Co
Veronica Klinefelt
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 109
Scope: MI
Hi! I can help you understand SB 109. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline