Clinical Research Pharmacies and Clinical Trials - Permits and Ownership
SB 778 creates a new "clinical research pharmacy permit" required for pharmacies conducting clinical trials in Maryland. It allows healthcare providers to own such pharmacies under specific conditions, including requiring a licensed pharmacist to be on-site at all times and prohibiting owners from receiving payment for patient referrals. The bill also exempts clinical trials conducted by corporations from being classified as "practice of medicine," removing a licensing barrier for these activities. This directly affects pharmacies seeking to operate clinical trials, healthcare providers considering ownership, and the State Board of Pharmacy (as the permit issuer).
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
Apr 2026
Introduced Feb 6, 2026
Signed Apr 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Clinical Research Pharmacies and Clinical Trials - Permits, Ownership, and Definition of Practice of Medicine
→
Third - Clinical Research Pharmacies and Clinical Trials - Permits and Ownership
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to clarify that clinical research pharmacies are exempt from certain licensing requirements for owners, rather than being broadly exempt from the definition of 'practice of medicine.' The text was also reorganized to remove redundant repeals and consolidate the list of sections being added or modified.
Scope change
The scope of the exemption for clinical research pharmacy owners was narrowed; the language was changed from an exemption from the 'definition of practice of medicine' to a specific prohibition on requiring a license to own the pharmacy.
ELIGIBILITY
The exemption from licensing requirements for clinical research pharmacy owners was rephrased to be more specific, stating that individuals cannot be required to obtain a license to own such a pharmacy.
DEFINITION
The bill's title and summary were updated to remove 'Definition of Practice of Medicine' from the main title, reflecting the change in the exemption language.
TECHNICAL
Redundant sections regarding the repeal and reenactment of existing laws were removed and consolidated to streamline the bill's structure.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 5, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 31, 2026
How they voted
44–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 49
Mar 5, 2026
D
Democratic36
91% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Apr 28, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 206
executive
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Apr 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Health
lower
Mar 31, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (130-6-6)
house of delegates
Mar 21, 2026
Committee
Referred Health
lower
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (44-0-5)
senate
Feb 6, 2026
Committee
First Reading Finance
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Brian Feldman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 778
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 778. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline