Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Reemployment After Retirement - Exemption from Earnings Offset
SB 710 exempts retirees from Maryland's Correctional Officers' Retirement System from having their retirement benefits reduced if they return to work as correctional officers or parole/probation staff in specific state correctional facilities. The bill amends pension law to remove the earnings offset requirement for these retirees when reemployed by the Division of Corrections, Division of Pretrial Detention, or Patuxent Institution for up to four years. This directly affects correctional officers who retired from the system and are rehired in authorized roles within state correctional facilities. The change ensures their retirement payments remain unchanged during this reemployment period, unlike the standard rule that reduces benefits for most other retirees returning to work.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2026
Signed into Law
Apr 2026
Introduced Feb 6, 2026
Signed Apr 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Reemployment After Retirement - Exemption from Earnings Offset
→
Third - Correctional Officers' Retirement System - Reemployment After Retirement - Exemption from Earnings Offset
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to clarify that the earnings offset exemption applies only to 'certain participating' employers rather than all of them, and to add a specific exemption for Correctional Officers reemployed as bailiffs in state courts. The version also includes a new header identifying the document as HB 1194, indicating a change in the bill's official number or a merge with another legislative text.
Scope change
The scope of the earnings offset exemption was narrowed by adding the qualifier 'certain' to participating employers, and a new specific exemption was created for bailiffs.
ELIGIBILITY
Changed the condition for the earnings offset exemption from applying to any 'participating employer' to only 'certain participating employers', narrowing the group of employers eligible for this benefit.
Added a new exemption clause allowing Correctional Officers who are reemployed as bailiffs in state courts to avoid the earnings offset.
TECHNICAL
Added a header identifying the document as 'HB 1194', suggesting a change in the bill number or a consolidation with another bill.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 5, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 31, 2026
How they voted
43–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 49
Mar 5, 2026
D
Democratic36
88% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Apr 28, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 258
executive
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Returned Passed
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable Report by Appropriations
lower
Mar 31, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (137-0-5)
house of delegates
Mar 21, 2026
Committee
Referred Appropriations
lower
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Budget and Taxation
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (43-0-6)
senate
Feb 6, 2026
Committee
First Reading Budget and Taxation
upper
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bryan Simonaire
RRepublican
P
Chris West
RRepublican
P
Johnny Salling
RRepublican
P
Paul Corderman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 710
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 710. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline