SB 661 Maryland Senate · 2026 Regular Session

Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence

SB 661 modifies Maryland law to clarify when intercepted communications (like phone calls or texts) can be used as evidence in criminal court. It allows such evidence if: (1) at least one party was outside Maryland during the communication, (2) the interception wasn’t done by Maryland law enforcement, and (3) all parties were co-conspirators in a violent crime. For other cases, it sets strict conditions for admissibility, including requiring prosecutors to notify defendants 14 days in advance and proving the evidence is more relevant than alternatives. The bill directly affects criminal defendants, prosecutors, and law enforcement handling wiretap evidence in Maryland courts. It takes effect October 1, 2026.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2026 Last action Mar 26, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

First - Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence Third - Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence · 4 edits
MODERATE
SB 661 significantly expands Maryland's wiretap exception law by adding a new affirmative defense that allows individuals to legally intercept communications if they reasonably believe they are in imminent danger of becoming a victim of a violent crime. The bill also clarifies that recordings of crimes against the person (murder, rape, and certain domestic assault) can be used as evidence in criminal proceedings.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of lawful wiretapping by creating a new exception for individuals who intercept communications to protect themselves from imminent danger of violent crimes, whereas previously only law enforcement and co-conspirators had specific exceptions.
ELIGIBILITY

Added an affirmative defense allowing individuals to intercept communications if they reasonably believed they were in imminent danger of becoming a victim of murder, rape, or first-degree domestic assault.

Added specific crimes against the person (murder, rape, and first-degree domestic assault) as qualifying offenses for evidence admissibility.

REQUIREMENT

Changed the bill's legislative history from repealing and reenacting Section 10-405 to adding a new subsection 10-402(c)(12) and repealing Section 10-405 with amendments.

TECHNICAL

Updated sponsor list to include additional senators and added committee report and adoption status indicating favorable action.

Floor votes · Senate Mar 5, 2026

How they voted

382
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 49
Mar 5, 2026
D Democratic36
30 Yea 6
83% Yea
R Republican13
8 Yea 2 Nay 3
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Mar 23, 2026
Committee
Referred Judiciary
lower
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-2-9)
senate
Feb 6, 2026
Committee
First Reading Judicial Proceedings
upper
11 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors