Health Services Cost Review Commission - Health Facilities - Rate Setting
SB 515 requires Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission to consider all operational costs incurred by health facilities - including expenses for physicians and other providers without corresponding billing revenue - when setting hospital rates. This affects hospitals and health facilities operating under Maryland's all-payer model, as the Commission must now factor in full costs during rate reviews. The bill amends existing law to mandate that the Commission evaluate facility financial health and certify rates based on complete cost accounting, rather than excluding certain expenses. This change ensures rates more accurately reflect actual facility operations, including costs for professional services that previously weren't fully counted.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Apr 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2026
Last action Apr 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Health Services Cost Review Commission - Health Facilities - Jurisdiction and Rate Setting
→
Third - Health Services Cost Review Commission - Health Facilities - Rate Setting
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was amended to authorize the Health Services Cost Review Commission to consider 'reasonable costs' rather than just 'all costs' when evaluating hospital facilities. Additionally, the bill's procedural status was updated to reflect it was adopted by the Senate and reported favorably with amendments.
Scope change
The scope of costs the Commission must consider was narrowed from 'all costs' to 'all reasonable costs', and the bill's procedural history was updated.
REQUIREMENT
The Commission is now required to take into account only 'reasonable costs' incurred or expenditures made by a health facility, rather than 'all costs'.
The specific language regarding costs to employ or contract with physicians was updated to ensure consistency with the new 'reasonable costs' requirement.
TECHNICAL
Procedural headers were added to indicate the bill was reported favorably with amendments and adopted by the Senate.
The bill's title was updated from 'altering the jurisdiction' to 'requiring authorizing the Commission', clarifying the legislative intent.
The repeal and reenactment instructions were reorganized to reflect the amendments made to the existing law.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 7, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 26, 2026
How they voted
44–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 49
Mar 7, 2026
D
Democratic36
88% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Apr 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Motion Special Order until Next Session (Delegate Buckel) Adopted
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Health
lower
Mar 26, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (132-2-8)
house of delegates
Mar 24, 2026
Committee
Referred Health
lower
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance
upper
Mar 7, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (44-0-5)
senate
Feb 3, 2026
Committee
First Reading Finance
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Pam Beidle
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 515
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 515. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline