Statute of Limitations - Civil Suits to Enforce Local Consumer Protection Codes
HB 1105 sets a 3-year statute of limitations for prosecuting or enforcing local consumer protection codes in Maryland. It requires that legal actions for fines, penalties, or equitable relief must be filed within 3 years after local authorities knew or reasonably should have known about a violation. This applies directly to municipalities with their own consumer protection codes and affects businesses or entities violating those local rules. The bill modifies Maryland's judicial code to establish this timeframe for enforcement actions.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Apr 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Apr 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2026
Last action Apr 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
First - Statute of Limitations - Prosecution or Enforcement of Local Consumer Protection Codes
→
Third - Statute of Limitations - Civil Suits to Enforce Local Consumer Protection Codes
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to clarify that it applies specifically to civil suits enforcing local consumer protection codes, rather than broader prosecutions. The sponsor list was updated to include Delegate Williams, and the bill was marked as favorably reported by the committee and adopted by the House.
Scope change
The scope was narrowed and clarified to explicitly cover 'civil suits' for enforcement, removing ambiguity about whether the statute applied to non-civil prosecutions.
SCOPE
The title and purpose were updated to specify that the statute of limitations applies to 'civil suits to enforce' local consumer protection codes, clarifying the legal mechanism involved.
ELIGIBILITY
The list of bill sponsors was updated to include Delegate Williams in addition to the original co-sponsors.
TECHNICAL
Status indicators were added showing the bill was favorably reported by the committee, adopted by the House, and read for the second time.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 27, 2026 · House of Delegates Mar 5, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 49
Mar 27, 2026
D
Democratic36
75% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Third Reading Passed
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 27, 2026
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-11)
senate
Mar 19, 2026
Committee
Referred Judicial Proceedings
upper
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Third Reading Passed
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
Motion Special Order until 03/18 (Delegate Buckel) Adopted
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments {
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Lower · Passed
Favorable with Amendments Report by Judiciary
lower
Mar 5, 2026
House Of Delegates · Passed
House of Delegates Vote: pass (132-1-9)
house of delegates
Feb 11, 2026
Committee
First Reading Judiciary
lower
12 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Caylin Young
DDemocratic
P
Elizabeth Embry
DDemocratic
P
Frank Conaway
DDemocratic
P
Jackie Addison
DDemocratic
P
Malcolm Ruff
DDemocratic
P
Mark Edelson
DDemocratic
P
Marlon Amprey
DDemocratic
P
Nicole Williams
DDemocratic
P
Regina Boyce
DDemocratic
P
Robbyn Lewis
DDemocratic
P
Sean Stinnett
DDemocratic
P
Stephanie Smith
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1105
Scope: MD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1105. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline